Peer-review process

Showing 1–10 of 55 results.

  1. A member of an author group listed on a paper denies authorship

  2. An accusation of racism

  3. An article in a high profile journal that potentially misappropriates research published in lower impact journals

  4. An enquiry about arbitrating reviewers

    Case number: 
    11-12
    Year: 
    2011
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  5. Anonymous peer review – author requesting manuscript file

  6. Author creates bogus email accounts for proposed reviewers

  7. Author of rejected letter blames global bias against his message and undisclosed conflicts of interest

  8. Author of rejected paper publicly names and criticises peer reviewer

  9. Author requests for certain experts not to be included in the editorial process

  10. Author requests permission to publish review comments

    Case number: 
    16-13
    Year: 
    2016
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed

Pages