Peer review

Showing 1–10 of 97 results.

  1. Questionable ethics related to clinical trial raised by peer-reviewer

    sabinekleinert - 26th Oct 2017

    Case number:  10-34 Case text (Anonymised) You can listen to the podcast of this case from the menu on the right We received a paper describing a clinical trial comparing treatment X with treatment Y. Treatment Y is the standard treatment for the indicati ...

  2. In the news: May 2018 Digest

    Sarah Gillmore - 18th Jun 2018

    Conflicts of Interest An article in HealthNewsReview.org discusses a paper published in the BMJ which was widely picked up in the news, but where the peer reviewers had close affiliations with the authors, and wonders if there are wider unexamined conflic ...

  3. Should we have had author consent for a randomised controlled trial of a peer review?

    Case number: 
    97-02
    Year: 
    1997

  4. The reviewer writes comments that he doesn’t want the author to see

    Case number: 
    97-08
    Year: 
    1997

  5. Who ensures the integrity of the editor?

    Case number: 
    99-22
    Year: 
    1999

  6. Publication bias arising from an editor’s activities

    Case number: 
    99-23
    Year: 
    1999

  7. Editorial compliance with duplicate publication

    Case number: 
    00-03
    Year: 
    2000

  8. Retrospective correction: how far back do we go?

    Case number: 
    00-21
    Year: 
    2000

  9. Authorship dispute

    Case number: 
    00-29
    Year: 
    2000

  10. Alleged plagiarism

    Case number: 
    00-33
    Year: 
    2000

Pages