Peer review

Showing 1–10 of 106 results.

  1. Should we have had author consent for a randomised controlled trial of a peer review?

    Case number: 
    97-02
    Year: 
    1997

  2. The reviewer writes comments that he doesn’t want the author to see

    Case number: 
    97-08
    Year: 
    1997

  3. Who ensures the integrity of the editor?

    Case number: 
    99-22
    Year: 
    1999

  4. Publication bias arising from an editor’s activities

    Case number: 
    99-23
    Year: 
    1999

  5. Editorial compliance with duplicate publication

    Case number: 
    00-03
    Year: 
    2000

  6. Retrospective correction: how far back do we go?

    Case number: 
    00-21
    Year: 
    2000

  7. Authorship dispute

    Case number: 
    00-29
    Year: 
    2000

  8. Alleged plagiarism

    Case number: 
    00-33
    Year: 
    2000

  9. Contacting Research Ethics Committees with concerns over studies

    Case number: 
    02-11
    Year: 
    2002

  10. An author thinks that a journal’s decision not to publish is ethically incorrect

    Case number: 
    03-02
    Year: 
    2003

Pages