Promoting integrity in research and its publication

COPE provides leadership in thinking on publication ethics and practical resources to educate and support members, and offers a professional voice in current debates.

We are looking for new COPE Council members as some of our current volunteers step down at the end of their term. Alison Taylor, on COPE Council 2014-2019 says: "COPE Council is a small, diverse group of experts, passionate about ethics in research publication. It’s been a pleasure and a learning experience to be a part of that group."

Our core practices

Core practices are the policies and practices journals and publishers need, to reach the highest standards in publication ethics. We include cases with advice, guidance for day-to-day practice, education modules and events on topical issues, to support journals and publishers fulfil their policies.

COPE Forum

Our next Forum, where members discuss and advise on current cases, will be held by webinar in February. If you have a case you can submit it to be discussed at the next Forum


Vacancies on COPE Council

We are looking for new COPE Council members as some of our current volunteers step down at the end of their term. We particularly welcome applications from China, the Middle East and Latin America, and from those with a background in the arts and humanities, but all applications from our general membership will be considered. "Inspiring, busy and exciting years. It has been a truly unique experience and I am happy to have done my bit." Iria del Río 2016-2019

COPE workshop on standards of peer review, 26 November at @UiTromso. With editor, author and reviewer perspectives and a cases workshop with COPE's Howard Browman and Mirjam Curno.

A summary of the updated COPE retraction guidelines; the reasons for retractions, motivation for retraction and who retracts; and a publisher's perspective. Presentations from Howard Browman, Thed van Leeuwen and Catriona Fennell #C0PE2019

With the advancement of AI and the introduction of data-driven solutions to many processes throughout the publication process, questions surrounding the relevant ethics arise as to if, when, and how AI could/should be used. Join the discussion

News & opinion

Authorship discussion document

Advice and guidance for editors, authors and research institutions: how to avoid authorship issues and steps to take when issues arise. Specific guidance where there seems to be consensus and asking for further comments from COPE members in some areas.

Out now! #C0PEDigest with a roundup of our European Seminar discussions, a focus on data & reproducibility and new Authorship guidance. We say a fond farewell and thank you to 6 of our Council members.

A journal rejected two manuscripts because of data fabrication. Without the lead author knowing, The co-authors had fabricated the dataset after recruiting only a few patients. Should others be informed about this case?

Karin Wulf writes a thought-provoking article on inclusion in scholarly practice that crosses all disciplines. Karin brings her own experience and a practical solution.