Editorial decisions

Showing 21–30 of 46 results.

  1. Submissions from members of the editorial board

  2. Questionable ethics related to clinical trial raised by peer-reviewer

  3. Author of rejected letter blames global bias against his message and undisclosed conflicts of interest

  4. WAME case

  5. An enquiry about arbitrating reviewers

    Case number: 
    11-12
    Year: 
    2011
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  6. Anonymity versus author transparency

  7. Department notification regarding sensitive topic

    Case number: 
    12-20
    Year: 
    2012
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  8. Ethical obligation to find reviewers

    Case number: 
    13-06
    Year: 
    2013
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  9. COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers- English
    Document

    Cynthia Clerk - 26th Oct 2017

    Peer review in all its forms plays an important role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The process depends to a large extent on trust, and requires that everyone involved behaves responsibly and ethically. Peer reviewers play a central an ...

  10. Reviewer concerns about transparency of peer review process

    Case number: 
    16-03
    Year: 
    2016
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed

Pages