Editorial decisions

Showing 21–30 of 46 results.

  1. Submissions from members of the editorial board

  2. Author of rejected letter blames global bias against his message and undisclosed conflicts of interest

  3. WAME case

  4. An enquiry about arbitrating reviewers

    Case number: 
    11-12
    Year: 
    2011
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  5. Anonymity versus author transparency

  6. Department notification regarding sensitive topic

    Case number: 
    12-20
    Year: 
    2012
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  7. Ethical obligation to find reviewers

    Case number: 
    13-06
    Year: 
    2013
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  8. COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers- English
    Document

    Cynthia Clerk - 26th Oct 2017

    Peer review in all its forms plays an important role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The process depends to a large extent on trust, and requires that everyone involved behaves responsibly and ethically. Peer reviewers play a central an ...

  9. Reviewer concerns about transparency of peer review process

    Case number: 
    16-03
    Year: 
    2016
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  10. Author requests permission to publish review comments

    Case number: 
    16-13
    Year: 
    2016
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed

Pages