Peer review

Showing 31–40 of 66 results.

  1. Complaint regarding letters to the editor

    Case number: 
    12-19
    Year: 
    2012
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  2. Department notification regarding sensitive topic

    Case number: 
    12-20
    Year: 
    2012
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  3. Two reviewer reports contain a significant amount of verbatim textual overlap

    Case number: 
    13-16
    Year: 
    2013
    Resolution: 
    On-going
  4. Possible breach of reviewer confidentiality
    Audio

  5. COPE statement on inappropriate manipulation of peer review processes

    Linda Gough - 26th Oct 2017

    The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)  has become aware of systematic, inappropriate attempts to manipulate the peer review processes of several journals across different publishers. These manipulations appear to have been orchestrated by a number of ...

  6. COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers- English
    Document

    Cynthia Clerk - 26th Oct 2017

    Peer review in all its forms plays an important role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The process depends to a large extent on trust, and requires that everyone involved behaves responsibly and ethically. Peer reviewers play a central an ...

  7. Reviewer concerns about transparency of peer review process

    Case number: 
    16-03
    Year: 
    2016
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  8. Author requests for certain experts not to be included in the editorial process

  9. Author of rejected paper publicly names and criticises peer reviewer

  10. Author requests permission to publish review comments

    Case number: 
    16-13
    Year: 
    2016
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed

Pages