Peer review
Showing 21–30 of 84 results.
-
Compromised peer review (unpublished)
Case number:12-16Year:2012Resolution:Case Closed -
Complaint regarding letters to the editor
Case number:12-19Year:2012Resolution:Case Closed -
Department notification regarding sensitive topic
Case number:12-20Year:2012Resolution:Case Closed -
Two reviewer reports contain a significant amount of verbatim textual overlap
Case number:13-16Year:2013Resolution:On-going -
Online posting of confidential draft by peer reviewer
Case number:13-15Year:2013Resolution:Case Closed -
Possible breach of reviewer confidentiality
Case number:14-06Year:2014Resolution:Case Closed -
COPE statement on inappropriate manipulation of peer review processes
Linda Gough - 26th Oct 2017
The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) has become aware of systematic, inappropriate attempts to manipulate the peer review processes of several journals across different publishers. These manipulations appear to have been orchestrated by a number of ...
-
Reviewer requests to be added as an author after publication
Case number:15-05Year:2015Resolution:Case Closed -
COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers- English
Cynthia Clerk - 7th Feb 2019
Peer review in all its forms plays an important role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The process depends to a large extent on trust, and requires that everyone involved behaves responsibly and ethically. Peer reviewers play a central an ...
-
New guidelines from COPE: ethical guidelines for peer reviewers, whistleblowers and more- Dr Virginia Barbour, COPE Chair
Cynthia Clerk - 29th Oct 2017
Download presentation: New guidelines from COPE: ethical guidelines for peer reviewers, whistleblowers and more {PDF, 1354 KB] Resource type Resource Media Download presentation: New guidelines from COPE: ethical guidelines for peer reviewers, whistleblo ...