Peer review

Showing 21–30 of 84 results.

  1. Compromised peer review (unpublished)

  2. Complaint regarding letters to the editor

    Case number: 
    12-19
    Year: 
    2012
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  3. Department notification regarding sensitive topic

    Case number: 
    12-20
    Year: 
    2012
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  4. Two reviewer reports contain a significant amount of verbatim textual overlap

    Case number: 
    13-16
    Year: 
    2013
    Resolution: 
    On-going
  5. Online posting of confidential draft by peer reviewer

  6. Possible breach of reviewer confidentiality
    Audio

  7. COPE statement on inappropriate manipulation of peer review processes

    Linda Gough - 26th Oct 2017

    The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)  has become aware of systematic, inappropriate attempts to manipulate the peer review processes of several journals across different publishers. These manipulations appear to have been orchestrated by a number of ...

  8. Reviewer requests to be added as an author after publication

  9. COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers- English
    Document

    Cynthia Clerk - 7th Feb 2019

    Peer review in all its forms plays an important role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The process depends to a large extent on trust, and requires that everyone involved behaves responsibly and ethically. Peer reviewers play a central an ...

  10. New guidelines from COPE: ethical guidelines for peer reviewers, whistleblowers and more- Dr Virginia Barbour, COPE Chair
    Presentation

    Cynthia Clerk - 29th Oct 2017

    Download presentation: New guidelines from COPE: ethical guidelines for peer reviewers, whistleblowers and more  {PDF, 1354 KB] Resource type Resource Media Download presentation: New guidelines from COPE: ethical guidelines for peer reviewers, whistleblo ...

Pages