Peer review

Showing 21–30 of 84 results.

1. Compromised peer review (unpublished)

   Case number: 

   12-16

   Year: 

   2012

   Resolution: 

   Case Closed

   • Correction of the literature
   • Correction of the literature, retractions

   • Legal issues

   • Complaints and appeals
   • Misconduct/questionable behaviour

   • Misconduct/questionable behaviour
   • Misconduct/questionable behaviour (author)
   • Misconduct/questionable behaviour (reviewer)

   • Peer review processes
   • Peer review

   • Peer review
   • Peer-review process

   • Post-publication discussions and corrections

   • Journal management

2. Complaint regarding letters to the editor

   Case number: 

   12-19

   Year: 

   2012

   Resolution: 

   Case Closed

   • Peer review processes
   • Peer review

   • Peer review
   • Peer-review process

3. Department notification regarding sensitive topic

   Case number: 

   12-20

   Year: 

   2012

   Resolution: 

   Case Closed

   • Peer review processes
   • Peer review

   • Editorial decisions
   • Peer review
   • Peer-review process

4. Two reviewer reports contain a significant amount of verbatim textual overlap

   Case number: 

   13-16

   Year: 

   2013

   Resolution: 

   On-going

   • Peer review processes
   • Peer review

   • Peer review

   • Intellectual property
   • Plagiarism

   • Plagiarism

5. Online posting of confidential draft by peer reviewer

   Case number: 

   13-15

   Year: 

   2013

   Resolution: 

   Case Closed

   • Intellectual property
   • Copyright

   • Copyright
   • Copyright disputes/breaches

   • Misconduct/questionable behaviour (reviewer)

   • Peer review processes
   • Peer review

   • Peer review

   • Complaints and appeals

6. Possible breach of reviewer confidentiality

   Audio

   Case number: 

   14-06

   Year: 

   2014

   Resolution: 

   Case Closed

   • Complaints and appeals
   • Misconduct/questionable behaviour

   • Misconduct/questionable behaviour (reviewer)

   • Peer review processes
   • Peer review

   • Peer review
   • Peer-review process

7. COPE statement on inappropriate manipulation of peer review processes

   Linda Gough - 26th Oct 2017

   The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)  has become aware of systematic, inappropriate attempts to manipulate the peer review processes of several journals across different publishers. These manipulations appear to have been orchestrated by a number of ...

8. Reviewer requests to be added as an author after publication

   Case number: 

   15-05

   Year: 

   2015

   Resolution: 

   Case Closed

   • Correction of the literature
   • Correction of the literature, retractions

   • Complaints and appeals
   • Misconduct/questionable behaviour

   • Misconduct/questionable behaviour
   • Misconduct/questionable behaviour (reviewer)

   • Peer review processes
   • Peer review

   • Peer review
   • Peer-review process

   • Post-publication discussions and corrections

9. COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers- English

   Document

   Cynthia Clerk - 7th Feb 2019

   Peer review in all its forms plays an important role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The process depends to a large extent on trust, and requires that everyone involved behaves responsibly and ethically. Peer reviewers play a central an ...

10. New guidelines from COPE: ethical guidelines for peer reviewers, whistleblowers and more- Dr Virginia Barbour, COPE Chair

    Presentation

    Cynthia Clerk - 29th Oct 2017

    Download presentation: New guidelines from COPE: ethical guidelines for peer reviewers, whistleblowers and more  {PDF, 1354 KB] Resource type Resource Media Download presentation: New guidelines from COPE: ethical guidelines for peer reviewers, whistleblo ...

Pages