Peer review

Showing 1–10 of 11 results.

  1. Suspect author

  2. A problematic obituary

  3. A highly critical obituary

  4. Ownership of an idea

  5. Ethics approval for audit 3

  6. Consideration of publishing raw data

  7. Inadequate reporting of a trial, despite earlier rejection from a different journal

  8. Case of figure duplication and manipulation involving two journals

  9. Meta-analysis: submission of unreliable findings

  10. Letter from the COPE co-Chairs: May 2018

    Sarah Gillmore - 14th May 2018

    Starting the conversation: Outcomes from a research integrity workshop for research institutions, editors and publishers On April 25th members of the Russell Group Integrity Forum met with members of COPE on the campus of the University of Birmingham, UK ...

Pages