Correction of the literature, corrigenda & errata

Showing 1–10 of 11 results.

  1. No study’s perfect: a cross-disciplinary analysis of published errata

    Cynthia Clerk - 30th Oct 2017

    Mistakes in research are inevitable, and publishing corrections is vital for the integrity of the literature. These errata rarely require a retraction, and are therefore considered a lesser concern. This perception might be wrong, however, because the act ...

  2. Sloppiness or deception?

    Case number: 
    03-14
    Year: 
    2003

  3. Definition of plagiarism?

    Case number: 
    07-05
    Year: 
    2007

  4. Author dispute over internal report

    Case number: 
    07-27
    Year: 
    2007

  5. Multiple failure to declare a relevant conflict of interest

    Case number: 
    07-33
    Year: 
    2007

  6. Correcting errors versus privileged information

    Case number: 
    12-05
    Year: 
    2012
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed

  7. Extensive publication errors. Should we 're-publish'?

    Case number: 
    12-18
    Year: 
    2012
    Resolution: 
    On-going

  8. How to correct a published paper

    Case number: 
    12-23
    Year: 
    2012
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed

  9. Identifying patient information published in a figure

    Case number: 
    13-19
    Year: 
    2013
    Resolution: 
    On-going

  10. When to conclude correspondence from reader about errors in a published article

    Case number: 
    17-03
    Year: 
    2017
    Resolution: 
    On-going

Pages