Post-publication corrections

This discussion panel features Elizabeth Moylan (Senior Manager, Research Integrity Strategy & Policy at Wiley), Mark Hooper (Manager, Research Ethics and Integrity at the Queensland University of Technology), and Jennifer Byrne (publication integrity ‘sleuth’ and the University of Sydney), talking about dealing with issues that arise after publication has taken place. The discussion is hosted by COPE Trustee, Deborah Kahn.

This discussion is one of eleven sessions hosted by COPE during Publication Integrity Week 2023.

Back to top

Post-publication concerns: current problems

The panellists start by identifying the problems with the current systems of handling post-publication concerns. Slowness and a reluctance to act by journals are identified as key issues, especially in the light of increased action by paper mills and the rise of generative AI, both of which produce problems at speed and scale. Some of the language used in industry best practices can also seem very punitive (for example, ‘Expressions of Concern’), while concerns raised have themselves become more complex in their origins and timing.

Suggested changes

When asked what changes they would like to see, the panellists raise a number of suggestions. These include enlarging the taxonomy of correction notes and comments, and making it easier for readers to raise concerns. Mandating pre-registration of studies could also be helpful in establishing whether research takes place on a trustworthy time-scale. Open research and greater transparency in peer review are all worthy aims, but there is also a need to address the root causes of some of the problems like paper mills. The panellists would also like to see more diversity in editorial boards and greater education more generally on post publication corrections and concerns.

Further reading

• Enhancing partnerships of institutions and journals to address concerns about research misconduct JAMA Network article

• Handling difficult cases a discussion on PLOS Blog

Related COPE resources

• Dealing with concerns about the integrity of published research COPE discussion document

• Handling of post-publication critiques COPE flowchart

• Diversifying editorial boards COPE Commentary 2021

Back to top