This section demonstrates the impact publication misconduct can have on your journal
What effects can misconduct have?
Research community
Misconduct can harm the research community causing:
-
Loss of trust in journals and research
- Damage to careers, including those of innocent collaborators and colleagues
- Damage to institutions' reputations
- Corruption of the evidence base
- Wasted time, effort, and funds
Research participants
-
Unethical research could directly harm research participants
General public
Misconduct can also harm the general public because:
- Practice and policy might be based on fraudulent research
- Future research and funding could be misdirected
Who might commit misconduct?
-
Authors and researchers
Types of misconduct authors and researchers might commit: unethical research ; fabrication; falsification, including image manipulation; plagiarism ; selective reporting ; redundant publication ; inappropriate authorship ; gift, guest, and ghost authorship ; undeclared conflicts of interests
-
Editors
Types of misconduct editors might commit: bias in selection; preferential treatment for friends or colleagues; breaching confidentiality; intentional delays for rivals
-
Reviewers
Types of misconduct reviewers might commit: plagiarism (of ideas, text, or data); undeclared conflicts of interest; breaching confidentiality; intentional delays
-
Publishers
Types of misconduct publishers might commit: plagiarism (of ideas, text, or data); undeclared conflicts of interest; breaching confidentiality; intentional delays
-
Funders
Types of misconduct funders might commit: suppressing inconvenient results; delaying publications; not giving authors access to data; attempting to bias the presentation of findings; not transparently disclosing their involvement