Search results for

Search results for '%E8%B7%A8%E5%A2%83%E7%94%B5%E5%95%86%E7%B3%BB%E7%BB%9F%E5%AE%9A%E5%88%B6%E5%BC%80%E5%8F%91%E3%80%90TG%E7%94%B5%E6%8A%A5%EF%BC%9A@EK7676%E3%80%91%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E5%8C%85%E7%BD%91%E6%90%AD%E5%BB%BA%E8%B7%A8%E5%A2%83%E7%94%B5%E5%95%86%E7%B3%BB%E7%BB%9F%E5%AE%9A%E5%88%B6%E5%BC%80%E5%8F%91%E3%80%90TG%E7%94%B5%E6%8A%A5%EF%BC%9A@EK7676%E3%80%91%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E5%8C%85%E7%BD%91%E6%90%AD%E5%BB%BAGb42zeLpP3'

Showing 341–342 of 342 results

Order by

Common editorial dilemmas: hypothetical cases

…conclusions, adding that your last letter to them stated you would accept the revision if they took into account the reviewer's comments, which they have done in full. Discussion The editor has already said s/he would accept with minor revisions, which had been done. Arguably the onus is on the editor to accept this article.…
Seminars and webinars

Webinar 2022: Managing paper mills

…processes? They are probably equally concerning. They are both bad in terms of contaminating the published record, but they operate in a slightly different way. And paper mills and predatory publishers can overlap eg predatory publishers may run paper mills. We need more research to understand this. Are there any legitimate reasons for adding an author after acceptance? We have seen…