Filter by content type

Filter by topic

Search results for 'IM%E5%8D%B3%E6%97%B6%E9%80%9A%E8%AE%AF%E6%BA%90%E7%A0%81%E6%90%AD%E5%BB%BA%E5%BC%80%E5%8F%91%E3%80%90TG%E7%94%B5%E6%8A%A5%EF%BC%9A@EK7676%E3%80%91%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E5%8C%85%E7%BD%91%E6%90%AD%E5%BB%BAIM%E5%8D%B3%E6%97%B6%E9%80%9A%E8%AE%AF%E6%BA%90%E7%A0%81%E6%90%AD%E5%BB%BA%E5%BC%80%E5%8F%91%E3%80%90TG%E7%94%B5%E6%8A%A5%EF%BC%9A@EK7676%E3%80%91%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E5%8C%85%E7%BD%91%E6%90%AD%E5%BB%BAxzBYRixCNF'

Showing 321–340 of 366 results
  • Case

    Withdrawal of acceptance based on potentially unconsented data

    …/06/22/tortuous-and-torturous-why-publishing-a-critical-letter-to-the-editor-is-so-difficult/">this discussion at Retraction Watch).    An intermediate solution might be to consider adding a note indicating that the articles were retracted and why. The journal could then ask the authors of the letters to adapt what they have written with this in mind and focus on what else they might want to…
  • Forum discussion topics

    Ethical considerations around book publishing

    …(members and non-members) can comment on this discussion. Comments are reviewed and, on approval, added below.…
  • Forum discussion topics

    Claiming institutional affiliations

    …affiliations Khaled Moustafa, Arabixiv Papers A summary of the discussion at the virtual Forum event will be added to this page shortly. Page updated: 12 December 2023 We welcome comments on…
  • Forum discussion topics

    Predatory publishing: next steps and where do we go from here?

    …alt="" src="/files/u7140/kelly_cobey_-_1.jpg" style="float: left; margin: 1px 3px; max-width: 100%; width: 120px; height: 81px;" /> Presentation by Kelly Cobey, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute     Developing a digital authenticator tool…
  • News

    In the news: August 2021

    …target="_blank">prevalence of misconduct, and the other at the prevalence of responsible research practices. In 2018, FEBS Press started to observe manuscripts that displayed possibly systematically fabricated data and which followed a recurring template. These manuscripts pointed at the existence of paper mills. Based on analysis of the…
  • News

    Complaints and Appeals focus

    COPE’s core practice # 3 recommends that:  “Journals should have a clearly described process for handling complaints against the journal, its staff, editorial board or publisher.” Such complaints can take many forms (there are 133 cases in the COPE case database), some fairly…
  • News

    In the news: March Digest

    …retractions of their own work, as well as adding a section describing study limitations to all published articles.  https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/leap.1282   COPE Council Member Rachel Safer…
  • Case

    Authorship issue

    …now left the institution). Dr A held the IRB. Dr A had instructed Dr C not to publish until the mother paper was completed. Dr C was asked by the editors to comment on these points, and he responded by saying that: the intellectual contribution from Drs A and B was minimal; he (Dr C) had added the relevant addendum to the IRB myself; Drs A and B had threatened to ruin his career if he did…
  • Case

    Author requests for certain experts not to be included in the editorial process

    …a policy for handling requests to exclude individuals from the journal’s editorial process. The following has been added to the journal’s editorial policy: “We reserve the right to send manuscripts to the reviewers of our choice”. The editor considers the case closed. Related resource Spanish version: 
  • Case

    Professional misconduct of one author

    …a valid reason for issuing a correction to the literature.    Moreover, if ICMJE authorship criteria are being used, the reason for removal of an author needs to be added; it must be an academic reason; and all authors would have to agree and sign off in…
  • News

    Artificial intelligence: Lightning talk summary

    …The checks carried out by AI are done at various stages: as part of initial verifications, as peer review is initiated, and as it continues. Sometimes flags are raised late in the process, for example, if new data have been added to the training bank after the article went into the process. Deciding when to run checks is a complicated process, especially when a manuscript is also changing as it…
  • Case

    Unethical research undertaken by a single handed GP

    …consent from an ethics committee. Indeed, I don’t see how he could possibly have got consent for such a study. I have written to ask him if he has got such consent and I’m waiting to hear from him. The patients clearly agreed to take the tablets, but I worry that they were misled over the scientific value of the study. What should I do, if as I suspect, I discover that the GP did not have ethical…
  • News

    Letter from COPE: June 2020

    …="https://publicationethics.org/resources/discussion-documents/cope-forum-6-march-2020-editing-reviewer-comments">website. Stay healthy and stay safe.   Nancy Chescheir & Caroline…
  • News

    Case discussion: critiques after publication

    …can be contacted and an expression of concern added in the interim. If the author remains uncooperative, the editor is bound to retract the paper for the sake of not misleading readers, researchers, practitioners, policy makers, and other stakeholders. The retraction notice should transparently explain what post-publication review procedures were followed and what happened. As an additional…
  • News

    Guest article: Inclusion in Scholarly Practice

    …there and on our social media (follow us @womnknowhistory!) is heavy. It’s used regularly when conferences organizers seek keynote speakers or panelists, editors are seeking peer reviewers, and, increasingly, when producers or reporters are seeking media background or commentary. The potential for AAHS to model new paths is profound, and I’m
  • Text Recycling: Forum discussion topic March 2013

    …should amend the literature by adding the missing citation and clarifying what is new in the subsequent publication versus the original publication. Journal editors should consider publishing a retraction article when: There is significant overlap in the text, generally excluding methods, with sections that are identical or near identical to a previous publication by the same…
  • News

    In the news: August

    …="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/07/21/book-review-research-ethics-in-the-real-world-by-helen-kara/" target="_blank">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/07/21/book-review-research-ethics-in-the-real-world-by-helen-kara/ Misconduct Jennifer A Byrne is a cancer researcher who is committed to cleaning the literature as much as she is to adding to it. She began her crusade to do so after noting…
  • News

    In the news: January Digest

    …behavioural research.  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-019-0772-6 Ethical oversight ICMJE recommendations have been revised. The main changes are rephrasing COIs to relationships and activities, adding efforts for inclusion and diversity, and advising against citing predatory…
  • News

    In the news: October Digest

    …="https://cen.acs.org/research-integrity/misconduct/China-strengthens-campaign-against-scientific/97/i35" target="_blank">https://cen.acs.org/research-integrity/misconduct/China-strengthens-campaign-against-scientific/97/i35 Interviews with 21 journal editors from North America across multiple disciplines about their thoughts about text recycling (AKA "Self-plagiarism") shows a wide-range of tolerance for the practice, from tolerance of it in some circumstances to absolute…
  • Forum discussion topics

    Peer review models

    …introduction to the COPE Forum discussion on the topic "Peer review models" with COPE Council Member, Patrick Franzen. COPE Forum discussion Peer review sits at the core of scholarly publishing.…

Pages