Filter by content type

Filter by topic

Search results for '%E9%87%91%E8%9E%8D%E6%B8%B8%E6%88%8F%E7%90%86%E8%B4%A2%E7%B3%BB%E7%BB%9F%E5%AE%9A%E5%88%B6%E5%BC%80%E5%8F%91%E3%80%90TG%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD@EK7676%E3%80%91%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E5%8C%85%E7%BD%91%E6%90%AD%E5%BB%BA%E9%87%91%E8%9E%8D%E6%B8%B8%E6%88%8F%E7%90%86%E8%B4%A2%E7%B3%BB%E7%BB%9F%E5%AE%9A%E5%88%B6%E5%BC%80%E5%8F%91%E3%80%90TG%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD%EF%BF%BD@EK7676%E3%80%91%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E5%8C%85%E7%BD%91%E6%90%AD%E5%BB%BASmOGdweqr3'

Showing 321–327 of 327 results
  • News

    In the news: July 2021

    …tenure decisions. This index can be gamed by excessive self-citation and there are instances of authors adding references at the revision stage of the peer review process after there is likely to be scrutiny of the reference list, producing in an “h-index factory“. The author proposes for these, and other reasons cited in the post, that the community of researchers and publishers need to “
  • Forum discussion topics

    Systematic manipulation of the publishing process via “paper mills”

    …is not necessarily a sign of a paper mill submission but if there are other red flags, it can be useful. Some additional features have been added. The original features for the tool were to protect against reviewer fraud and a report would only be issued after peer review. A new setting (low, medium, high) can raise an alert if there is a high rate of submission from the same device. Would it be…
  • News

    Case Discussion: Lack of trial registration leads to new concerns about study conduct and ethical review/approval

    …institution, who was not a co-author and wished to remain anonymous, informed the editors that the ethics committee named in the article did not exist at the institution. After not hearing back from the authors, the editors added a Comment to the article alerting readers of non-adherence to clinical trial requirements. The authors later said that ethics approval had been granted by another…
  • News

    Where next in peer review? Part 2: COPE commentary

    …knowledge to fully understand the capabilities and threats presented by AI. On the potential for personal information to make its way back into training data, for example, Dustin Smith (a self-declared ‘AI optimist’) was quite clear. Where LLMs are trained on closed data sets (that is, with no new information added to it over time), there is little risk of material submitted to it reappearing in…
  • Membership application FAQ

    …membership is accepted? When your application is accepted, you will receive an email confirming this. You will receive a link to COPE’s Member Handbook which details the benefits of being a COPE member as well as how to manage your membership. If membership fees are applicable, an invoice will be sent to you. Once your membership fees are paid, your journal details will be added to our…
  • Common editorial dilemmas: hypothetical cases

    …conclusions, adding that your last letter to them stated you would accept the revision if they took into account the reviewer's comments, which they have done in full.   Discussion The editor has already said s/he would accept with minor revisions, which had been done. Arguably the onus is on the editor to accept this article.…
  • Seminars and webinars

    Webinar 2022: Managing paper mills

    …processes? They are probably equally concerning. They are both bad in terms of contaminating the published record, but they operate in a slightly different way. And paper mills and predatory publishers can overlap eg predatory publishers may run paper mills. We need more research to understand this. Are there any legitimate reasons for adding an author after acceptance? We have seen…

Pages