Filter by content type

Filter by topic

Search results for '%E6%89%B9%E5%8F%91%E4%BA%A7%E5%93%81%E6%8A%95%E8%B5%84%E7%90%86%E8%B4%A2%E7%B3%BB%E7%BB%9F%E5%AE%9A%E5%88%B6%E5%BC%80%E5%8F%91%E3%80%90TG%E7%94%B5%E6%8A%A5%EF%BC%9A@EK7676%E3%80%91%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E5%8C%85%E7%BD%91%E6%90%AD%E5%BB%BA%E6%89%B9%E5%8F%91%E4%BA%A7%E5%93%81%E6%8A%95%E8%B5%84%E7%90%86%E8%B4%A2%E7%B3%BB%E7%BB%9F%E5%AE%9A%E5%88%B6%E5%BC%80%E5%8F%91%E3%80%90TG%E7%94%B5%E6%8A%A5%EF%BC%9A@EK7676%E3%80%91%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E5%8C%85%E7%BD%91%E6%90%AD%E5%BB%BATlmRUmigga'

Showing 321–340 of 350 results
  • News

    In the news: July Digest

    …="_blank">https://www.hindustantimes.com/education/ugc-move-to-thwart-pay-and-publish-trash-culture/story-AP0BFFrbNuL1mN5WNbgCjI.html Peer review An experiment on peer review conducted by researchers at Harvard Business School, found that almost 50% of reviewers of medical funding applications changed their own ratings…
  • Case

    Possible fabricated data: a conspiracy of silence?

    This complicated case provoked much discussion. The advice was to reinstate the review but without the three disputed papers, adding a note to say that there is a potential problem with these three papers. It was felt that if the data are fabricated, there was a responsibility on the part of the editor not to publish the data as there might be a significant risk to patients if the trial was…
  • Case

    Withdrawal of acceptance based on potentially unconsented data

    …/06/22/tortuous-and-torturous-why-publishing-a-critical-letter-to-the-editor-is-so-difficult/">this discussion at Retraction Watch).    An intermediate solution might be to consider adding a note indicating that the articles were retracted and why. The journal could then ask the authors of the letters to adapt what they have written with this in mind and focus on what else they might want to…
  • Forum discussion topics

    Ethical considerations around book publishing

    …(members and non-members) can comment on this discussion. Comments are reviewed and, on approval, added below.…
  • Forum discussion topics

    Claiming institutional affiliations

    …affiliations Khaled Moustafa, Arabixiv Papers A summary of the discussion at the virtual Forum event will be added to this page shortly. Page updated: 12 December 2023 We welcome comments on…
  • News

    Welcome new COPE members April-June 2019

    Welcome to our new members who have joined COPE between April and June 2019. The new members have been assessed against criteria outlined in the Principles of Transparency and signing up to COPE shows that they intend to follow the highest standards of publication ethics and to apply COPE principles of publication ethics outlined in the 
  • News

    In the news: May 2020

    …that predatory journals are adapting, to "look" more like legitimate journals. The use of peer review appears to be increasing. These authors sent a previously published journal article to over 600 journals, a mix of predatory, legitimate open access and subscription-based journals. The paper was rejected by about 95% of the journals, but only about half of these were for ethical concerns. They…
  • News

    In the news: March Digest

    …retractions of their own work, as well as adding a section describing study limitations to all published articles.  https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/leap.1282   COPE Council Member Rachel Safer…
  • Case

    Authorship issue

    …now left the institution). Dr A held the IRB. Dr A had instructed Dr C not to publish until the mother paper was completed. Dr C was asked by the editors to comment on these points, and he responded by saying that: the intellectual contribution from Drs A and B was minimal; he (Dr C) had added the relevant addendum to the IRB myself; Drs A and B had threatened to ruin his career if he did…
  • Case

    Author requests for certain experts not to be included in the editorial process

    …a policy for handling requests to exclude individuals from the journal’s editorial process. The following has been added to the journal’s editorial policy: “We reserve the right to send manuscripts to the reviewers of our choice”. The editor considers the case closed. Related resource Spanish version: 
  • Case

    Professional misconduct of one author

    …a valid reason for issuing a correction to the literature.    Moreover, if ICMJE authorship criteria are being used, the reason for removal of an author needs to be added; it must be an academic reason; and all authors would have to agree and sign off in…
  • News

    Artificial intelligence: Lightning talk summary

    …The checks carried out by AI are done at various stages: as part of initial verifications, as peer review is initiated, and as it continues. Sometimes flags are raised late in the process, for example, if new data have been added to the training bank after the article went into the process. Deciding when to run checks is a complicated process, especially when a manuscript is also changing as it…
  • New UK Panel for Research Integrity

    …instances occur. Project approval was granted through to September 2004. Professor Michael Farthing was appointed to lead the project on account of his expertise in the field and as former chair of COPE. One of the first tasks was to survey the membership to look at the nature and prevalence of research misconduct. Seventy per cent of the membership (86 members)…
  • News

    Case discussion: gift authorship

    …authorship came from further study of 81 of the hyperprolific authors. Of the 27 authors who completed a survey, 19 admitted failing to meet one of the four ICMJE authorship criteria in more than a quarter of their papers and 11 admitted failing to meet two or more…
  • News

    Case discussion: critiques after publication

    …can be contacted and an expression of concern added in the interim. If the author remains uncooperative, the editor is bound to retract the paper for the sake of not misleading readers, researchers, practitioners, policy makers, and other stakeholders. The retraction notice should transparently explain what post-publication review procedures were followed and what happened. As an additional…
  • Text Recycling: Forum discussion topic March 2013

    …should amend the literature by adding the missing citation and clarifying what is new in the subsequent publication versus the original publication. Journal editors should consider publishing a retraction article when: There is significant overlap in the text, generally excluding methods, with sections that are identical or near identical to a previous publication by the same…
  • News

    In the news: August

    …="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/07/21/book-review-research-ethics-in-the-real-world-by-helen-kara/" target="_blank">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/07/21/book-review-research-ethics-in-the-real-world-by-helen-kara/ Misconduct Jennifer A Byrne is a cancer researcher who is committed to cleaning the literature as much as she is to adding to it. She began her crusade to do so after noting…
  • News

    In the news: January Digest

    …behavioural research.  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-019-0772-6 Ethical oversight ICMJE recommendations have been revised. The main changes are rephrasing COIs to relationships and activities, adding efforts for inclusion and diversity, and advising against citing predatory…
  • News

    In the news: February Digest

    …were male and younger”. Only 8.1% of reviewers opted to reveal their names and the authors suggest that this supports the view that peer review depends on anonymity. Preprints Papers with involve human subjects or their medical records will not be accepted by 4 major orthopedic journals if they have been posted on a preprint server. The editors of the journals jointly published an…
  • Forum discussion topics

    What does peer review mean in the arts, humanities and social sciences?

    …include adding non-native speakers to editorial boards to advise from a high level perspective in an important way; editors entering retirement offering mentorship outside the publication process; for society journals, pairing society members internationally with published mentors and see if they can meet the authorship criteria Post your comments and feedback below.

Pages