You are here

Home Resources

Translated resources

COPE guidance is designed to help editors, publishers and others involved in publication ethics follow COPE's Core Practices when developing policies and practices, or when faced with an issue. Selected COPE guidance has been translated into various languages including flowcharts, discussion documents, guidelines and eLearning modules.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.2.27

Cómo reconocer la potencial manipulación del proceso de revisión por pares

Los pares revisores pueden ser sugeridos por:

About this resource

Author Developed by COPE Council
Version 1 September 2017
How to cite this
COPE Council. How to spot potential manipulation of the peer review process (Latin American Spanish). Version 1. 2017 https://doi.org/10.24318/ cope.2019.2.27
Our COPE materials are available to use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
Non-commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works —
You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. We ask that you give full accreditation to COPE with a link to our website: publicationethics.org

Full page history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.2.28

Qué considerar al ser invitado a hacer una revisión por pares de un manuscrito

For the latest version (English language) of this guidance visit https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.2.17

Related resources

About this resource

Author Developed by COPE Council
Version 1 August 2018
How to cite this
COPE Council. What to consider when asked to peer review a manuscript (Latin American Spanish). Version 1. 2018. https://doi.org/10.24318/ cope.2019.2.28

Our COPE materials are available to use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
Non-commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works —
You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. We ask that you give full accreditation to COPE with a link to our website: publicationethics.org

Full page history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.10

Una Introducción

Los revisores pares juegan un papel en asegurar la integridad del registro académico. El proceso de revisión por pares depende en gran medida en la confianza y disposición a participar de la comunidad académica y requiere que todos los involucrados se comporten de modo responsable y ético. Los revisores pares juegan un papel central y crítico en el proceso de revisión por pares, pero pueden llegar a asumir ese papel sin orientación y tener poco presentes sus obligaciones éticas.

About this resource

Written by COPE Council
Version 2 September 2017
Version 1 March 2013
How to cite this 
COPE Council. COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers (Spanish). Version 2 September 2017 https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.10

Our COPE materials are available to use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
Non-commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works —
You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. We ask that you give full accreditation to COPE with a link to our website: publicationethics.org

 

Full page history

  • 26 February 2024

    New category

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.11

COPE同行评审专家道德指南 COPE理事会 同行评审专家在确保学术记录的诚信方面发挥着作用。同行评审过程很大程度上取决于学术界 的信任以及积极参与，并需要参与各方都以负责任和讲道德的态度行事。同行评审专家在同行 评审过程中发挥着中心和关键的作用，但却可能在担当职责的同时并未获得任何指引，也没有意 识到他们的道德义务。期刊有义务为同行评审提供透明的政策，而审稿人有义务道德地、负责任 地进行评审。期刊与审稿人之间的清楚沟通对于促进一致、公平且及时的评审至关重要。COPE 听取了成员关于同行评审问题的情况意见并以COPE论坛参与人员的集体经验和智能作为指南 的部分基础。希望指南能够为研究人员提供有用的指导，成为编辑和出版商指导其审稿人的参 考，并作为机构培养学生和研究人员的教育资源。

For the latest version (English language) of this guidance visit https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.9

About this resource

Written by COPE Council
Version 2  November 2017
Version 1 February 2017
How to cite this 
COPE Council. COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers (Chinese). Version 2. November 2017. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.11

Our COPE materials are available to use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
Non-commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works —
You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. We ask that you give full accreditation to COPE with a link to our website: publicationethics.org

Full page history

  • 21 February 2023

    Re-allocated to the new 'Translated Resources' category

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.3.4

COPE ¿Qué constituye una autoría?

El presente documento apunta a estimular intercambio en relación a los temas más comunes de la autoría enfrentados por miembros de COPE. Trata de las guías existentes en asuntos de autoría, compila algunos principios básicos para ayudar a prevenir problemas comunes y presenta algunos de los temas más complicados que han surgido en intercambios anteriores, muchos de los cuales son específicos a disciplinas y requieren de consideración más minuciosa.

About this resource

Full page history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.3.5

作者身份由什么构成? COPE讨论文件

本文旨在围绕出版伦理委员会(Committee on Publication Ethics,COPE)成员最常面对的作者身份问题 激发讨论。文中探讨了有关作者身份的现有指导方针，总结了一些有助于防止发生常见问题的基本原则， 并且列出了在之前的讨论中提出的一些更棘手的问题，其中许多问题具有学科特定性并需要更细致的考 虑。COPE欢迎针对本文提供反馈，并邀请成员指出来自不同学科的进一步作者身份指南。我们鼓励期 刊编辑和出版机构作出评论（无论是否为COPE成员），同时也欢迎来自研究人员/作者和学术机构的意 见。请将所有评论意见通过电子邮件发送至COPE运营经理Natalie Ridgeway,具体联络方式如下 :http://publicationethics.org/contact-us

For the latest version (English language) of this guidance visit https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.3.3

About this resource

Written by COPE Council
Version 1 June 2014

How to cite this  COPE Council. What constitutes authorship? (Chinese). June 2014.  https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.3.5

Our COPE materials are available to use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they
endorse you or your use of the work).

Non-commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works — You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. We ask that you give full accreditation to COPE with a link to our website: publicationethics.org

Full page history

  • 21 February 2023

    New category

Pages