- Seminars and webinars
Seminar 2015: Ethical peer review in a changing and challenging scholarly publication world
…Download presentation: Ethical peer review in a changing and challenging scholarly publication world [PDF, 998KB]… - Seminars and webinars
European Seminar 2013: COPE’s new ethical guidelines for peer reviewers
…Download presentation:COPE’s new ethical guidelines for peer reviewers: background, issues and evolution [PDF 400KB]… - Seminars and webinars
Australian Seminar 2014: New guidelines from COPE, ethical guidelines for peer reviewers, whistleblowers and more
…Download presentation: New guidelines from COPE: ethical guidelines for peer reviewers, whistleblowers and more {PDF, 1354 KB]… - Seminars and webinars
North American Seminar 2016: Can you spot a fake? The trends of fake peer reviews
…Download presentation: Can you spot a fake? The trend of fake peer reviews [PDF, 848KB] … - Seminars and webinars
North American Seminar 2016: Who's reviewing the reviewers?
…Download presentation: Who's reviewing the reviewers? [PDF, 740Kb]… - Research
An analysis of peer review cases brought to COPE from 1997-2016
[PDF, 100Kb - click image to download] … - Flowcharts
Peer review manipulation suspected during the peer review process
COPE's flowchart on what to do if peer review manipulation is suspected during the peer review process. Peer review manipulation suspected during the peer review process - Seminars and webinars
China Seminar 2017: Peer review in the journals published by Chinese Medical Association, experiences and challenges
…Download presentation: Peer review in the journals published by Chinese Medical Association: experiences and challenges [PDF, 451KB]… - Guidelines
Editing peer reviews
Advising editors, publishers, and researchers on expected practices and appropriate circumstances regarding the editing of peer reviews. The guidelines look at the need for journals to amend peer reviews, and provide insight into situations where this might be an appropriate course of action. Journals should have clear policies on what is acceptable and unacceptable in a reviewer… - Flowcharts
Peer review manipulation suspected after publication
COPE's flowchart on what to do if peer review manipulation is suspected after publication. Peer review manipulation suspected after publication - Guidelines
Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers
Peer review guidelines provide basic principles and standards to which all peer reviewers should adhere during the peer review process in research publication. Peer reviewers play a central and critical part in the peer-review process, but too often come to the role without any guidance and unaware of their ethical obligations. These guidelines are intended to be applied across… - Discussion documents
Who 'owns' peer reviews? September 2017
This COPE discussion document introduces issues and guidance around the ownership of peer reviews. Questions discussed include: who has ownership of peer review comments; who gets to determine whether a review can be made public, and if so, which parties would be required to consent to its publication. The document also covers whether the sharing of reviewer comments breaches the… - Flowcharts
What to consider when asked to peer review a manuscript
COPE guidance on what to consider when asked to peer review a manuscript. The flowchart is a step by step guide to help potential peer reviewers make a decision on whether to accept or decline the invitation. What to consider when asked to peer review… - Flowcharts
How to recognise potential manipulation of the peer review process
COPE's guide on how to recognise potential manipulation of the peer review process. It contains details on recognised features or patterns of reviewer activity and best practice recommendations on how to minimise peer review manipulation. How to recognise potential… - Seminars and webinars
J-STAGE Seminar 2021: Peer review
Dr Trevor Lane, COPE Council member, was invited by the Japan Science and Technology Agency to speak at the First J-STAGE webinar on 28 July 2021 for local editors, academic societies, researchers, and administrators. Titled “Fundamental Principles of Peer Review and Peer Review Ethics”, the presentation introduced COPE to the 200+ attendees and covered topics including peer review models,… - Forum discussion topics
Peer review models
…introduction to the COPE Forum discussion on the topic "Peer review models" with COPE Council Member, Patrick Franzen. COPE Forum discussion Peer review sits at the core of scholarly publishing.… - Seminars and webinars
COPE webinar 2017: Current issues in peer review
For Peer Review Week 2017, COPE held a Webinar on the current issues in Peer Review, moderated by Heather Tierney, Managing Editor of Journals and Ethics Policy at the American Chemical Society, and COPE Council Member. The guest speakers were: Tony Ross-Hellauer, Scientific Manager at the OPENAire2020 project, University of Göttinge; Jessica Polka, Director of ASAPbio… - Seminars and webinars
COPE Podcast 2018: Diversity and Inclusivity in Peer Review
Diversity and inclusivity in peer review. Podcast with Professor Andy Hor, Hong Kong University A discussion in 2018 with Charon Pierson, COPE Secretary and Andy Hor, Vice President of Research at Hong Kong University. An institutional perspective on training early career researchers within a culture of diversity and inclusivity. - Forum discussion topics
COPE Forum 9 September 2015: Who “owns” peer review?
Two trends have recently come together within scholarly publication; open review, and the desire to give credit to reviewers. At the convergence are organizations like Publons and Academic Karma who wish to openly acknowledge the work of peer-reviewers by recording, not only the amount, but also, in some circumstances, the content of individuals’ peer-review activity. Academics may view… - Seminars and webinars
China Seminar 2017: Peer review: strengths, limitations and emerging issues
…Download presentation: "Peer review: strengths, limitations and emerging…