Cases

Showing 1–25 of 73 results.

  1. Service evaluation as research in a controversial area of medicine

    Case number: 
    17-17
    Year: 
    2017
    Resolution: 
    On-going
  2. Authorship issues from disbanded consortium

  3. Editor found guilty of research misconduct

  4. Lead author of a research paper disagrees with content of a linked editorial

  5. Is it plagiarism to use text verbatim from a manuscript review?

  6. Case histories and post publication debate

  7. Author requests permission to publish review comments

    Case number: 
    16-13
    Year: 
    2016
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  8. Author of rejected paper publicly names and criticises peer reviewer

  9. Author requests for certain experts not to be included in the editorial process

  10. Reviewer concerns about transparency of peer review process

    Case number: 
    16-03
    Year: 
    2016
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  11. Reviewer requests to be added as an author after publication

  12. Possible breach of reviewer confidentiality
    Audio

  13. Online posting of confidential draft by peer reviewer

  14. Two reviewer reports contain a significant amount of verbatim textual overlap

    Case number: 
    13-16
    Year: 
    2013
    Resolution: 
    On-going
  15. Ethical obligation to find reviewers

    Case number: 
    13-06
    Year: 
    2013
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  16. Department notification regarding sensitive topic

    Case number: 
    12-20
    Year: 
    2012
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  17. Complaint regarding letters to the editor

    Case number: 
    12-19
    Year: 
    2012
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  18. Anonymity versus author transparency

  19. Compromised peer review (unpublished)

  20. Compromised peer review system in published papers

  21. Meta-analysis: submission of unreliable findings

  22. More than a breach of confidentiality?

  23. Review of a book written by an editor of a journal

  24. Reviewer asks trainee to review manuscript

  25. Author creates bogus email accounts for proposed reviewers

Pages