Cases

Showing 1–25 of 74 results.

  1. Peer reviewer contacted by author

  2. Editor and reviewers requiring authors to cite their own work

  3. Service evaluation as research in a controversial area of medicine

  4. Authorship issues from disbanded consortium

  5. Editor found guilty of research misconduct

  6. Lead author of a research paper disagrees with content of a linked editorial

  7. Is it plagiarism to use text verbatim from a manuscript review?

  8. Case histories and post publication debate

  9. Author requests permission to publish review comments

    Case number: 
    16-13
    Year: 
    2016
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  10. Author of rejected paper publicly names and criticises peer reviewer

  11. Author requests for certain experts not to be included in the editorial process

  12. Reviewer concerns about transparency of peer review process

    Case number: 
    16-03
    Year: 
    2016
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  13. Reviewer requests to be added as an author after publication

  14. Possible breach of reviewer confidentiality
    Audio

  15. Online posting of confidential draft by peer reviewer

  16. Two reviewer reports contain a significant amount of verbatim textual overlap

    Case number: 
    13-16
    Year: 
    2013
    Resolution: 
    On-going
  17. Ethical obligation to find reviewers

    Case number: 
    13-06
    Year: 
    2013
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  18. Department notification regarding sensitive topic

    Case number: 
    12-20
    Year: 
    2012
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  19. Complaint regarding letters to the editor

    Case number: 
    12-19
    Year: 
    2012
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  20. Anonymity versus author transparency

  21. Compromised peer review (unpublished)

  22. Compromised peer review system in published papers

  23. Meta-analysis: submission of unreliable findings

  24. More than a breach of confidentiality?

  25. Review of a book written by an editor of a journal

Pages