Showing 1–25 of 111 results.

  1. Increased number of casual submissions

    Case number: 
  2. Retrospective registration, outcome switching and ethical approval

  3. Editor and reviewers requiring authors to cite their own work

  4. Unethical withdrawal after acceptance to maximize the 'impact factor'?

  5. Stolen article

  6. Pre-publication in a discussion paper series

  7. Editor manipulation of impact factor

  8. Satire in scholarly publishing

  9. Request by organisation to retract article and publish expression of concern

  10. Author of rejected paper publicly names and criticises peer reviewer

  11. Attempt to supress legitimate scientific results

  12. Image manipulation as a general practice

  13. Editor as author of a paper

  14. Ethical concerns and the validity of documentation supplied by the authors

  15. Paper submitted for publication without consent or knowledge of co-authors

  16. Plagiarism in a book title

  17. Extensive publication errors. Should we 're-publish'?

  18. Anonymity versus author transparency

  19. Compromised peer review (unpublished)

  20. Compromised peer review system in published papers

  21. How to correct an incorrect decision to publish a flawed paper

  22. Author creates bogus email accounts for proposed reviewers

  23. Retraction or correction?

  24. Disagreement between authors and sponsor

  25. Lack of trial registration leads to new concerns about study conduct and ethical review/approval