Cases

Showing 1–25 of 73 results.

  1. Editor and reviewers requiring authors to cite their own work

  2. Service evaluation as research in a controversial area of medicine

  3. Authorship issues from disbanded consortium

  4. Editor found guilty of research misconduct

  5. Lead author of a research paper disagrees with content of a linked editorial

  6. Is it plagiarism to use text verbatim from a manuscript review?

  7. Case histories and post publication debate

  8. Author requests permission to publish review comments

    Case number: 
    16-13
    Year: 
    2016
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  9. Author of rejected paper publicly names and criticises peer reviewer

  10. Author requests for certain experts not to be included in the editorial process

  11. Reviewer concerns about transparency of peer review process

    Case number: 
    16-03
    Year: 
    2016
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  12. Reviewer requests to be added as an author after publication

  13. Possible breach of reviewer confidentiality
    Audio

  14. Online posting of confidential draft by peer reviewer

  15. Two reviewer reports contain a significant amount of verbatim textual overlap

    Case number: 
    13-16
    Year: 
    2013
    Resolution: 
    On-going
  16. Ethical obligation to find reviewers

    Case number: 
    13-06
    Year: 
    2013
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  17. Department notification regarding sensitive topic

    Case number: 
    12-20
    Year: 
    2012
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  18. Complaint regarding letters to the editor

    Case number: 
    12-19
    Year: 
    2012
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  19. Anonymity versus author transparency

  20. Compromised peer review (unpublished)

  21. Compromised peer review system in published papers

  22. Meta-analysis: submission of unreliable findings

  23. More than a breach of confidentiality?

  24. Review of a book written by an editor of a journal

  25. Reviewer asks trainee to review manuscript

Pages