Peer-review process

Showing 11–20 of 74 results.

  1. Can you spot a fake? The trends of fake peer reviews- Alison McCook, Retraction Watch
    Presentation

    Dom Mitchell - 19th Dec 2017

    Download presentation: Can you spot a fake? The trends of fake peer reviews  [PDF, 848KB] Resource type Resource Media Download presentation: Can you spot a fake? The trends of fake peer reviews PDF, 848Kb Download 848.08 KB Resource category Seminars and ...

  2. Case of figure duplication and manipulation involving two journals

  3. Complaint regarding letters to the editor

    Case number: 
    12-19
    Year: 
    2012
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  4. Compromised peer review (unpublished)

  5. Compromised peer review system in published papers

  6. Contacting Research Ethics Committees with concerns over studies

  7. COPE Education Subcommittee focus: Peer Review

    Sarah Gillmore - 12th Sep 2018

    Not surprisingly, COPE has substantial resources available regarding peer review and peer review processes are one of our 10 core practices. Peer review comes in many shapes and forms, and the process varies widely among different publications. The fundam ...

  8. COPE endorses EASE SAGER guidelines

    Sarah Gillmore - 3rd Oct 2018

    COPE endorses the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines developed by the European Association of Science Editors (EASE).  The vision of the EASE Gender Policy Committee is "Greater gender diversity in science and publishing practices f ...

  9. COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers (Latin American Spanish)
    Document

    Sarah Gillmore - 6th Nov 2018

    Download "COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers- Spanish " [PDF, 571KB, Version 2, August 2018]   Resource type Resource Media Ethical_Guidelines_For_Peer_Reviewers_2_LASpanish.pdf PDF, 571KB, Version 2, August 2018 Download 557.33 KB Resou ...

  10. COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers- Chinese
    Document

    Cynthia Clerk - 18th Oct 2018

    Peer review in all its forms plays an important role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The process depends to a large extent on trust, and requires that everyone involved behaves responsibly and ethically. Peer reviewers play a central an ...

Pages