Editorial decisions

Showing 31–40 of 47 results.

  1. Author requests permission to publish review comments

    Case number: 
    Case Closed
  2. COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers- Chinese

    Cynthia Clerk - 14th Nov 2017

    Peer review in all its forms plays an important role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The process depends to a large extent on trust, and requires that everyone involved behaves responsibly and ethically. Peer reviewers play a central an ...

  3. Editor found guilty of research misconduct

  4. COPE Forum 9 September 2015: Who “owns” peer review?

    Cynthia Clerk - 29th Jan 2018

    Two trends have recently come together within scholarly publication; open review, and the desire to give credit to reviewers. At the convergence are organizations like Publons and Academic Karma who wish to openly acknowledge the work of peer-reviewers by ...

  5. Editorial compliance with duplicate publication

  6. Retrospective correction: how far back do we go?

  7. Salami publication

  8. Who 'owns' peer reviews? September 2017

    Cynthia Clerk - 9th Mar 2018

        Discussion document on who "owns" peer reviews? [PDF, 164KB] Resource type Resource Resource category Discussion documents COPE Discussion Documents Who 'owns' peer reviews? September 2017 Summary     Discussion document on who &qu ...

  9. Service evaluation as research in a controversial area of medicine

  10. Authorship issues from disbanded consortium