Showing 61–68 of 68 results.
Dom Mitchell - 26th Oct 2017
[PDF, 100Kb- click image to download] Resource type Resource Resource category Research COPE Research 2017 Summary [PDF, 100Kb- click image to download] Classifications Ethical review/approval Peer review processes Peer review Peer review ...
Dom Mitchell - 12th Jun 2018
From the Seminar: 2017: Current Issues in Peer Review, COPE webinar Download presentation: Discussing the topical issues in peer review (PDF, 4351KB) 14 September 2017 Guest speakers: Tony Ross-Hellauer Scientific Manager OPENAire2020 project, Universit ...
Cynthia Clerk - 14th Nov 2017
Peer review in all its forms plays an important role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The process depends to a large extent on trust, and requires that everyone involved behaves responsibly and ethically. Peer reviewers play a central an ...
Cynthia Clerk - 29th Jan 2018
Two trends have recently come together within scholarly publication; open review, and the desire to give credit to reviewers. At the convergence are organizations like Publons and Academic Karma who wish to openly acknowledge the work of peer-reviewers by ...
Cynthia Clerk - 9th Mar 2018
Discussion document on who "owns" peer reviews? [PDF, 164KB] Resource type Resource Resource category Discussion documents COPE Discussion Documents Who 'owns' peer reviews? September 2017 Summary Discussion document on who &qu ...
Sarah Gillmore - 19th Jun 2018
Conflicts of Interest An article in HealthNewsReview.org discusses a paper published in the BMJ which was widely picked up in the news, but where the peer reviewers had close affiliations with the authors, and wonders if there are wider unexamined conflic ...
Sarah Gillmore - 14th May 2018
Starting the conversation: Outcomes from a research integrity workshop for research institutions, editors and publishers On April 25th members of the Russell Group Integrity Forum met with members of COPE on the campus of the University of Birmingham, UK ...