Peer review

Showing 10 results.

  1. Retrospective correction: how far back do we go?

  2. Author of rejected letter blames global bias against his message and undisclosed conflicts of interest

  3. Lack of trial registration leads to new concerns about study conduct and ethical review/approval

  4. Author creates bogus email accounts for proposed reviewers

  5. Compromised peer review system in published papers

  6. Compromised peer review (unpublished)

  7. Author of rejected paper publicly names and criticises peer reviewer

  8. Editor and reviewers requiring authors to cite their own work

  9. In the news: October 2018 Digest

    Sarah Gillmore - 28th Nov 2018

    Journal Management This month’s topic is “journal management” and on first blush, it isn’t obvious how the concept of “ethics” applies to this topic. I thought of things like selection and implementation of a manuscript manager, paying bills, identifying ...

  10. Dispute arising from peer review of a rejected comment and published correction