Peer review

Showing 10 results.

  1. Should we have had author consent for a randomised controlled trial of a peer review?

  2. Contacting Research Ethics Committees with concerns over studies

  3. Inadequate reporting of a trial, despite earlier rejection from a different journal

  4. Questionable ethics related to clinical trial raised by peer-reviewer

  5. What to consider when asked to peer review a manuscript

    Dom Mitchell - 26th Oct 2017

    Download "What to consider when asked to peer review a manuscript" flowchart (PDF, 155KB) Back to main flowcharts page Resource type Resource Media Download "What to consider when asked to peer review a manuscript" flowchart PDF,155KB ...

  6. An analysis of peer review cases brought to COPE from 1997-2016

    Dom Mitchell - 26th Oct 2017

    [PDF, 100Kb- click image to download] Resource type Resource Resource category Research COPE Research 2017 Summary [PDF, 100Kb- click image to download] Classifications Ethical review/approval Peer review processes Peer review Peer review ...

  7. Ethical peer review in a changing and challenging scholarly publication world — Dr Irene Hames, Editorial and Publishing Consultant, COPE Council Member 2010–13
    Presentation

    Cynthia Clerk - 30th Oct 2017

    Download presentation: Ethical peer review in a changing and challenging scholarly publication world    [PDF, 998KB] Resource type Resource Media Download presentation: Ethical peer review in a changing and challenging scholarly publication world PDF, 998 ...

  8. Retrospective correction: how far back do we go?

  9. Lack of trial registration leads to new concerns about study conduct and ethical review/approval

  10. Case of figure duplication and manipulation involving two journals