Peer review

Showing 61–70 of 96 results.

  1. What to consider when asked to peer review a manuscript

    Dom Mitchell - 26th Oct 2017

    Download "What to consider when asked to peer review a manuscript" flowchart (PDF, 155KB) Back to main flowcharts page Resource type Resource Media Download "What to consider when asked to peer review a manuscript" flowchart PDF,155KB ...

  2. How to spot potential manipulation of the peer review process

    Dom Mitchell - 2nd Nov 2017

    Download flowchart: How to spot potential manipulation of the peer review process  (PDF, 283KB) Back to main flowcharts page Resource type Resource Media Download flowchart: How to spot potential manipulation of the peer review process PDF, 283KB (Version ...

  3. An analysis of peer review cases brought to COPE from 1997-2016

    Dom Mitchell - 26th Oct 2017

    [PDF, 100Kb- click image to download] Resource type Resource Resource category Research COPE Research 2017 Summary [PDF, 100Kb- click image to download] Classifications Ethical review/approval Peer review processes Peer review Peer review ...

  4. COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers- Chinese
    Document

    Cynthia Clerk - 14th Nov 2017

    Peer review in all its forms plays an important role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The process depends to a large extent on trust, and requires that everyone involved behaves responsibly and ethically. Peer reviewers play a central an ...

  5. Editor found guilty of research misconduct

  6. Online posting of confidential draft by peer reviewer

  7. COPE Forum 9 September 2015: Who “owns” peer review?

    Cynthia Clerk - 29th Jan 2018

    Two trends have recently come together within scholarly publication; open review, and the desire to give credit to reviewers. At the convergence are organizations like Publons and Academic Karma who wish to openly acknowledge the work of peer-reviewers by ...

  8. COPE Forum 24 July 2017: Preprints: what are the issues?

    Cynthia Clerk - 29th Jan 2018

    Preprints and working papers have been posted and shared for many years. They report research results that have not undergone peer review, although in many cases the authors also submit to a journal (before, after or at the same time as making a preprint ...

  9. Editorial compliance with duplicate publication

  10. Retrospective correction: how far back do we go?

Pages