Peer review

Showing 11–18 of 18 results.

1. Case of figure duplication and manipulation involving two journals

   Case number: 

   11-13

   Year: 

   2011

   Resolution: 

   Closed: author misconduct

   • Correction of the literature
   • Correction of the literature, retractions

   • Data and reproducibility
   • Data

   • Image manipulation

   • Complaints and appeals
   • Misconduct/questionable behaviour

   • Misconduct sanctions
   • Misconduct/questionable behaviour
   • Misconduct/questionable behaviour (author)

   • Peer review
   • Peer-review process

   • Research integrity/ethics investigations

   • Redundant/duplicate publication

   • Post-publication discussions and corrections

   • Peer review processes

   • Ethical oversight

2. Ethical peer review in a changing and challenging scholarly publication world — Dr Irene Hames, Editorial and Publishing Consultant, COPE Council Member 2010–13

   Presentation

   Cynthia Clerk - 30th Oct 2017

   Download presentation: Ethical peer review in a changing and challenging scholarly publication world    [PDF, 998KB] Resource type Resource Media Download presentation: Ethical peer review in a changing and challenging scholarly publication world PDF, 998 ...

3. What to consider when asked to peer review a manuscript

   Dom Mitchell - 20th Nov 2018

   Download "What to consider when asked to peer review a manuscript" flowchart (PDF, 155KB) Back to main flowcharts page Resource type Resource Media Download "What to consider when asked to peer review a manuscript" flowchart PDF,155KB ...

4. An analysis of peer review cases brought to COPE from 1997-2016

   Dom Mitchell - 26th Oct 2017

   [PDF, 100Kb- click image to download] Resource type Resource Resource category Research COPE Research 2017 Summary [PDF, 100Kb- click image to download] Classifications Ethical review/approval Peer review processes Peer review Peer review ...

5. Service evaluation as research in a controversial area of medicine

   Case number: 

   17-17

   Year: 

   2017

   Resolution: 

   Case Closed

   • Ethical oversight
   • Questionable/unethical research

   • Ethical review/approval

   • Editorial decisions

6. Letter from the COPE co-Chairs: May 2018

   Sarah Gillmore - 20th Sep 2018

   Starting the conversation: Outcomes from a research integrity workshop for research institutions, editors and publishers On April 25th members of the Russell Group Integrity Forum met with members of COPE on the campus of the University of Birmingham, UK ...

7. What to consider when asked to peer review a manuscript- Latin American Spanish

   Sarah Gillmore - 20th Nov 2018

   Download "What to consider when asked to peer review a manuscript" flowchart- Spanish (PDF, 546KB) Back to main flowcharts page Resource type Resource Media What_To_Consider_When_Asked_To_Peer_Review_Latin American Spanish.pdf PDF, 546KB (Versio ...

8. In the news: October 2018 Digest

   Sarah Gillmore - 28th Nov 2018

   Journal Management This month’s topic is “journal management” and on first blush, it isn’t obvious how the concept of “ethics” applies to this topic. I thought of things like selection and implementation of a manuscript manager, paying bills, identifying ...

Pages