Peer review

Showing 1–10 of 18 results.

  1. Should we have had author consent for a randomised controlled trial of a peer review?

  2. Retrospective correction: how far back do we go?

  3. Alleged plagiarism

  4. Contacting Research Ethics Committees with concerns over studies

  5. Patient consent

  6. Ethics approval for audit 3

  7. Consideration of publishing raw data

  8. Inadequate reporting of a trial, despite earlier rejection from a different journal

  9. Suspect author

  10. Lack of trial registration leads to new concerns about study conduct and ethical review/approval