Peer review

Showing 1–10 of 17 results.

  1. Should we have had author consent for a randomised controlled trial of a peer review?

  2. Retrospective correction: how far back do we go?

  3. Alleged plagiarism

  4. Contacting Research Ethics Committees with concerns over studies

  5. Patient consent

  6. Ethics approval for audit 3

  7. Consideration of publishing raw data

  8. Inadequate reporting of a trial, despite earlier rejection from a different journal

  9. Suspect author

  10. Questionable ethics related to clinical trial raised by peer-reviewer

    sabinekleinert - 26th Oct 2017

    Case number:  10-34 Case text (Anonymised) You can listen to the podcast of this case from the menu on the right We received a paper describing a clinical trial comparing treatment X with treatment Y. Treatment Y is the standard treatment for the indicati ...