Data, selective/misleading reporting/interpretation

Showing 1–10 of 21 results.

1. A first report, not followed by a second

   Case number: 

   99-10

   Year: 

   1999

   • Data and reproducibility
   • Data

   • Data
   • Data, selective/misleading reporting/interpretation

2. An anonymous letter in response to qualitative research

   Case number: 

   99-19

   Year: 

   1999

   • Data and reproducibility
   • Data

   • Data
   • Data integrity
   • Data, selective/misleading reporting/interpretation

3. Late reinterpretation and a new author

   Case number: 

   02-06

   Year: 

   2002

   • Authorship and contributorship
   • Authorship

   • Changes in authorship
   • Disputed authorship
   • Questionable authorship practice

   • Data, selective/misleading reporting/interpretation

   • Data and reproducibility

4. Possible malpractice revealed in a case report

   Case number: 

   04-19

   Year: 

   2004

   • Data and reproducibility
   • Data

   • Data
   • Data, selective/misleading reporting/interpretation

   • Complaints and appeals
   • Misconduct/questionable behaviour

   • Misconduct/questionable behaviour
   • Misconduct/questionable behaviour (author)

   • Protection of subject (human)

   • Ethical oversight

5. A case of scientific misconduct?

   Case number: 

   06-31

   Year: 

   2006

   • Data and reproducibility
   • Data

   • Data
   • Data fabrication
   • Data, selective/misleading reporting/interpretation

   • Ethical oversight
   • Questionable/unethical research

   • Ethical review/approval
   • Participant consent
   • Protection of subject (human)
   • Questionable/unethical research

6. Concern about reporting of a trial and also its DSMB

   Case number: 

   09-10

   Year: 

   2009

   • Authorship
   • Questionable authorship practice

   • Conflicts of interest / Competing interests
   • Conflict of interest

   • Conflict of interest (author)

   • Data and reproducibility
   • Data

   • Data
   • Data, selective/misleading reporting/interpretation

   • Research integrity/ethics investigations

   • Authorship and contributorship

   • Ethical oversight

7. Publication of misleading information and publication

   Case number: 

   99-08

   Year: 

   1999

   • Consent for publication

   • Data and reproducibility
   • Data

   • Data
   • Data, selective/misleading reporting/interpretation

   • Funder/sponsor role

   • Intellectual property

   • Journal management

8. The incomplete systematic review

   Case number: 

   01-01

   Year: 

   2001

   • Conflicts of interest / Competing interests
   • Conflict of interest

   • Conflict of interest
   • Conflict of interest (author)

   • Data and reproducibility
   • Data

   • Data
   • Data, selective/misleading reporting/interpretation

   • Funder/sponsor role

   • Journal management

9. Arm twisting an editor

   Case number: 

   02-09

   Year: 

   2002

   • Authorship and contributorship
   • Authorship

   • Authorship
   • Changes in authorship
   • Disputed authorship

   • Conflict of interest

   • Data and reproducibility
   • Data

   • Data
   • Data, selective/misleading reporting/interpretation

   • Editorial independence

   • Journal management

10. Possible deception because of omission of important information

    Case number: 

    03-19

    Year: 

    2003

    • Data and reproducibility
    • Data

    • Data
    • Data, selective/misleading reporting/interpretation

    • Journal management
    • Funding/sponsorship

    • Funder/sponsor role
    • Funding/sponsorship

Pages