Filter by content type

Filter by topic

Search results for 'MT5交易程序源碼系統【TG电报:@EK7676】平台包网搭建MT5交易程序源碼系統【TG电报:@EK7676】平台包网搭建7k3MAy8oAo'

Showing 561–580 of 699 results
  • Case

    Patient consent

    …evidence that this syndrome may be associated with malingering. The report was reviewed by the Editorial Committee and publication offered as a letter.   It was noted, however, that consent had not been provided and this was sought from the authors.  The authors explained that this was not available and the Editor explored the possibilities of publishing without patient’s consent, applying the
  • Case

    Ethical approval for retrospective study

    …individuals affected by this rare disease. Only the editorial team could make the final decision as to whether to publish or not. However, the general view was that it was in the public’s interest to have the study published, and that it will probably bring benefits to the very people whose autonomy may be harmed by its publication. An accompanying editorial, drawing readers’ attention to the matter and the…
  • Case

    Should we always follow the decisions of ethics committees?

    …committee. It was suggested that, if receipt of the documents confirms lack of transparency or failure to obtain informed consent, the editor may wish to report the authors to the GMC or other equivalent regulatory authority. In answer to the editor’s initial question, the Forum agreed that an editor does not always have to follow the judgement of an ethics committee and he does have an…
  • Case

    Availability of reagents

    …research of company Y wrote “In view of the fact that our X cell technology is fully approved by the FDA and that the technology is in use for preclinical and clinical research by a substantial number of licensees, we are confident that independent scientific validation is not an argument to share our X cell line with Dr Z”. The editor-in-chief may wish to consider his response the next time…
  • Case

    Paper published that is a verbatim copy of another published one by another author

    …We then wrote to the authors informing them of the two discoveries and requesting an explanation, an apology or retraction, and notifying them that we may contact the University President about their unethical behaviour. The senior author withdrew the paper being currently reviewed but nothing else. We then wrote to his University’s President, only to discover a couple of weeks later, through…
  • Case

    HIV homeopathy

    The Forum questioned whether in fact there was a local ethics committee, which may be a reason why the authors obtained approval in their own country. However, the Forum was unanimous in their view that the authors had behaved unethically. All agreed that the editor had done all he could and there is little more action that he can take, although some advised contacting the ethics committee or…
  • Case

    Conflicting claims of intellectual property?

    The Forum was unanimous in their opinion that neither the editor nor the publisher should investigate the matter. Journals are not set up to carry out investigations. The advice was not to publish the paper until the author dispute is resolved. The editor should contact both institutions and ask them to conduct an investigation into this matter. The Forum also commented that this may be a case…
  • Case

    Retract, correct, or both?

    …discussion, in order to put it into context Meanwhile, I have written to the corresponding author without response. My intention is to contact the corresponding author's institution(s) if there's still no response by the end of May. I have also written to the research ethics committee at the hospital concerned to check that approval was given as claimed in the paper (so far also without…
  • Case

    Lack of acknowledgement of contributor

    …the findings are unreliable or in cases of serious misconduct such as plagiarism. Also, COPE does not advocate banning offending authors from publication for any period of time as it may have legal implications. The advice from the Forum was to retract the retraction using carefully agreed wording and publish a correction that acknowledges the original co-authorship of the original complainant. The…
  • Case

    Falsified references

    …scientific veracity of the studies and perhaps this too needed to be investigated, not only in terms of the current paper, but also in relation to previous papers published by this author. The editor told the Forum that other journals had published papers by this author and the Forum advised the editor to contact these editors and share her findings. It may be that all of the editors could write to the…
  • Case

    Unethical private practice

    Based on advice from the COPE forum, we have again attempted to contact the institution through their general email address—we have still not been successful in identifying a personal contact at the institution. Our next step will be to find someone to help us translate the website or an editorial board member who may be able to help us identify a committee or other point of contact in the…
  • Case

    Disclosure and transparency issue

    COPE has guidelines on ‘What constitutes authorship’, which the editor may find useful to consult (http://publicationethics.org/files/u7141/Authorship_DiscussionDocument_0_0.pdf).It is very difficult for an editor to make a definitive decision on who qualifies for authorship. The Forum advised…
  • Case

    Licence for a published scale

    …if the demands of the developer are reasonable. The Forum agreed this is a very difficult issue, with no easy solution. A suggestion was to write an editorial, highlighting this issue. It seems that there may be many journals who are experiencing similar problems. The editor might consider contacting other editors and producing a joint editorial or opinion piece, highlighting the issues…
  • Case

    Author displays bullying behaviour towards handling editor

    …requested formally by a lawyer.  The Forum suggested that in retrospect, perhaps the journal should have involved the other co-authors, given that it was the corresponding author who made the threats. It is possible the co-authors may not have been aware of the corresponding author’s threats.  Also, with the benefit of hindsight, it is possible that after the author had done the social media…
  • Case

    Use of secondary data without proper attribution

    …was not directly noted here as an area of concern, if the journal has concerns about potential overlaps in the description of the recruitment process/sample size, and other details, the journal may wish to contact the institution to request a copy of the thesis for comparison. …
  • Case

    Secondary analysis of medical records and ethics committee approval

    …published elsewhere without anyone questioning the ethics.  It may turn out to be reasonable to publish the study, but institutional review board approval is always a good idea in research involving human subjects, even if at the end of the process it is decided that there is no risk. Researchers deciding for themselves that there is no risk is a conflict of interest, no matter how reasonable the…
  • Case

    Ethical issues of responding to government agency request for information

    …agencies, who may potentially issue a subpoena for the information.  Question for COPE Council What advice can COPE offer in respect to this scenario? …
  • Case

    Retraction request after university investigation found no evidence of fraud

    …university. Similarly, if Professor Z is concerned there may be a suspected cover up by the university, then they should again pursue the matter with the university, using whatever processes are available within that university. So, given the outcome of the university investigation, the journal has no choice but to refuse to retract the article until and unless new evidence emerges that there is…
  • News

    Announcement of COPE Council elections

    Due to expansion of the size of COPE Council, we are seeking nominations for two new candidates. These are voluntary positions. Council is responsible for COPE’s policy and management. Council members are expected to attend four meetings a year (in London) as well as take part in subcommittees and other COPE related tasks. It may be possible to attend some meetings by phone. There are…
  • Membership: universities and research institutes

    COPE announced the launch of membership for selected universities and research institutes in May 2022. An initial group of universities and research institutes have joined as members and will help ensure that the dedicated resources provide the appropriate support and guidance that universities and research institutes need: Aston University |

Pages