Filter by content type

Filter by topic

Search results for '系統幣程序源碼交易【TG电报:@EK7676】平台包网搭建系統幣程序源碼交易【TG电报:@EK7676】平台包网搭建gF5K29uLOg'

Showing 41–60 of 112 results
  • Case

    Erratum query

    We have been notified that an erratum is about to be published on a Research article in Journal A, which is one of the key references supporting a Review article subsequently published in Journal B. All parties are agreed that the erratum (which corrects an oversight in reporting methodology) in no way affects either the data presented in the paper or the conclusions reached. Questio…
  • News

    COPE Asia-Pacific Workshop 2018: Report

    …session. Clearly marking preprints as not peer reviewed, a need for standardising citations of preprints, and special considerations in screening and posting medical preprints were among the topics discussed. On the second day, immediately after the ISMTE…
  • News

    Ethical oversight focus

    …_Reports_guidance_from_COPE.pdf">consent for medical case reports and research issues specific to social science disciplines. Journals must diligently review submitted work to ensure that it conforms with research ethics guidelines, a process…
  • News

    Letter from the COPE Chair: August 2019

    …European colleagues there. Best wishes, COPE Chair Deborah Poff…
  • Case

    An investigation into results that were “almost too good to be true”

    A general medical journal received an RCT from a seldom-published, single-author, in an eastern European country. The results were striking, with an effect size that surpassed that of established medications for this condition, so the manuscript was sent for peer review. One reviewer commented that the results were “so highly statistically significant it is almost too good to be tr…
  • Case

    Reviewer asks trainee to review manuscript

    A known expert in a certain content area was asked to review a manuscript. He asked if one of his trainees (not a content expert) could review the manuscript instead, with some oversight and as a training exercise. He stated that he would provide the trainee with a full explanation of confidentiality. The section editor replied that it was the particular expertise of the invited reviewer that w…
  • News

    COPE advice to editors on geopolitical intrusions on editorial decisions

    …Update 2022 First released: 10 March 2022 Updated: 29 March 2022 There has been much discussion recently on government sanctions against Russia and the potential effect on Russian researchers. COPE has discussed the issue of geopolitical intrusion into editorial decision making previously in similar situations. COPE's position on this remains as…
  • News

    Conflicts of interest focus

    …what needs to be disclosed by all parties, including type of competing interest, extent, and recency. As Dr Neville Gibbs reminds us in a past COPE seminar presentation, transparency is key. Relevant conflicts of interest can go beyond funding source and commercial and/or personal financial gain. An acid test is…
  • Case

    Pre-publication in a discussion paper series

    …journals_final%20%281%29.pdf">http://publicationethics.org/files/u7141/Forum%20Discussion%20summary_Issues%20related%20to%20papers%20submitted%20to%20“discussion”%20journals_final%20%281%29.pdf) which reminds us that whether a DOI has been assigned and if the former version is hosted by a publisher are also factors that need to be taken into account. The usual practice is not to remove former…
  • Case

    Authorship dispute

    Two manuscripts were received by Journal X, from author A. Both were accepted and sent to the publisher. On receipt of the galley proofs, the corresponding author removed the name of the last author from both manuscripts. Shortly before the page proofs arrived, the journal editors received a request that author A be allowed to remove author B from the authors’ list and instead make a suitable a…
  • Case

    A systematic review on a country’s health problem written by non-native authors

    Journal A received a submission which focused on a systematic review/meta-analysis of a health problem in a specific country. It was written by four authors who do not live in that country. In addition, none of the authors seem to have any professional affiliation with any institution or researchers in that country. The systematic review/meta-analysis was based on published references and did n…
  • Case

    Authorship order in dual publications

    A group of experts from two different learned societies produced a consensus of guidelines on the management of a condition. Both societies wished to publish the manuscript in the respective journals of their societies. However, they requested the authorship order be different on the two respective submissions.   Questions for COPE Council Is it feasible to pub…
  • News

    New: Chinese resources

    …="https://publicationethics.org/files/Ethical_Guidlines_for_PeerReviewers_Chinese_Web.pdf">Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers Discussion document: What constitutes authorship? Flowcharts: Complete set of flowcharts
  • News

    Letter from the COPE Chair: October 2019

    …National Science Foundation, on text recycling which is now in its second year. We had a session on retractions which included an update on COPE’s newly
  • Event

    15th EASE General Assembly and Conference

    …scientific writing mistakes: Grammar and presentation In partnership with Edanz Innovative Scientific Solutions, trainer Gareth Dyke Tuesday, 29 June,12.00pm BST Price £100, EASE conference delegates are eligible for a reduced price £40
  • Discussion documents

    Best practice in theses publishing. March 2017

    …class="resource-download-inline"> Document Best practice for issues around theses publishing
  • News

    Letter from the COPE Chair: June 2019

    …scholarly integrity.  We hope you all enjoy the summer whether on vacation or using the extra time to work on scholarship.    COPE Chair Deborah…
  • News

    Letter from the COPE Chair: July 2020

    …href="https://www.stm-assoc.org/standards-technology/peer-review-taxonomy-project/">standard taxonomy for peer review. Wishing you all the best. COPE Chair Deborah Poff, CM, PhD  …
  • Case

    Enquiry regarding copyright/retractions

    A journal received a paper that had previously been retracted from another publisher’s journal as a result of malpractice in the peer review process (a result of reviewer/editor misconduct rather than actions on the part of the authors).  Having reviewed various sources of guidance, it would appear that there is some precedent for re-publication of retracted papers (suitably corrected or…
  • News

    Letter from COPE Vice-Chair: October 2018

    COPE was well represented at two very important meetings this September. The first “Seeking Solutions in Research Integrity: A View from All Perspectives” was a day long Research Integrity Summit hosted by Ohio…

Pages