Filter by content type

Filter by topic

Search results for '期权股票交易系统快速搭建【TG���������@EK7676】平台包网搭建期权股票交易系统快速搭建【TG���������@EK7676】平台包网搭建WoKlGLOa21'

Showing 41–60 of 131 results
  • Case

    The case of a physician in private practice offering an experimental intervention

    A physician in private practice wrote to our journal asking if we were interested in a paper discussing his experience of offering a novel intravenous therapy to his patients. He hoped we wouldn’t discriminate against him for being an author in private practice. He had given this therapy to nine patients with a variety of acute and chronic illnesses, including himself. The physician says that a…
  • Case

    Can two DOIs be assigned to the same manuscript?

    A preprint server owned by a commercial publishing company posted a paper and assigned a DOI to the preprint. The manuscript was then submitted to peer reviewed journal X, owned by a different publisher. Assuming acceptance at the journal, can the article be published under a different DOI belonging to journal X? At journal X, Crossref registration is automatic. However, can two differen…
  • Case

    Suspected systematic data fabrication

    21 (66%) of the papers were suspect, in comparison with none of a large control sample of papers from other institutions publishing in the same journals (detailed confidential report supplied). Inspection of the figures did indeed indicate a consistency of error bars that were highly unlikely to have been generated by chance variation, suggesting that there is a prima facie evidence for…
  • Event

    COPE Forum: September 2022

    …cases to the COPE Forum update us on their progress. 21-13 Authorship dispute involving a commercial institution 22-01 Removing a retracted article from a third party site …
  • Case

    Author trap/fabrication detection

    This is how I dealt with an author who submitted a fabricated manuscript to my journal. A junior doctor submitted a paper about the use of a drug in a particular condition. Three expert reviewers were sure that the author did not undertake the claimed study, emphasising that the drug was not available in our country (Middle Eastern country) and it had not been registered for clinical use…
  • Case

    Dual publication

    The authors submitted a paper to our journal which went through the review process and was accepted for publication. It was then placed online in corrected proof. While online we were informed by a reader that the paper appeared to have been published in a journal local to the authors, although only an abstract was available in English. We requested that the authors submit an English language v…
  • Research

    Authorship research project 2009

    …professional, academic or research organizations or associations. These results are now being written up in a second manuscript. The results of this part of the research will be presented at the Second World Conference on Research Integrity in Singapore, 21-24 July 2010, where we plan to start the Delphi process for discussing the definitions of…
  • Case

    Manuscript submitted based on retracted paper

    A paper was published in a journal. After publication, the author contacted the journal to ask for withdrawal of the paper because of some mistakes. After careful and considered review of the content of this paper by a duly constituted expert committee, the paper was found to be incomplete due to the dependent variable used in the analysis and the literature review used. The paper was re…
  • Case

    Editor manipulation of impact factor

    …="https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/resource-library/editorial-policies/white-paper-on-publication-ethics/2-1-editor-roles-and-responsibilities/#215" target="_blank">https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/resource-library/editorial-policies/white-paper-on-publication-ethics/2-1-editor-roles-and-responsibilities/#215…
  • Event

    COPE European Seminar 2014

    …rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif;">Venue: Representation of the State of Hessen to the European Union, Rue Montoyer 21, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Case

    Ethics of non-active management of a control group

    An article was submitted involving over 200 pregnant patients with a systemic illness (from 2010 to 2015) who were recruited and assigned to a control group or an active intervention group (of their systemic illness). The control group received routine antenatal care while the intervention group had active surveillance and management of their systemic illness during the pregnancy. There…
  • Case

    Corrigendum or erratum?

    The publisher of a journal has found a spelling mistake in a published manuscript (an abbreviation was explained incorrectly in the original published manuscript). Having in mind COPE's guidelines, "The term erratum usually refers to a production error, caused by the journal. The term corrigendum (or correction) usually refers to an author error", is a corrigendum the proper way to correct this…
  • Event

    COPE Forum: December 2023

    …Forum is: Tuesday 21 November 2023. --> Forum agenda On Tuesday 5 December 2023 the COPE Forum will be held at 10:00-11:30 (GMT / UTC) 1. Update on COPE activities Update on COPE activities by the Chair. 2. Forum discussion topic: Claiming affiliations We begin the COPE Forum with a discussion on 
  • Discussion documents

    How should editors respond to plagiarism? April 2011

    …Contents Aims and scope Background Introduction Types of plagiarism 2.1 Extent 2.2 Originality of copied material 2.3 Position / context 2.4 Referencing / attribution 2.5 Intention 2.6 Author seniority 2.7 Language Detecting and responding to plagiarism Screening for plagiarism Defining…
  • Research

    Exploring publication ethics in the arts, humanities, and social sciences: A COPE study 2019

    …fabrication (31%). Recognising and dealing with bias in peer reviewer comments was an issue encountered by 55% of journal editors. Journal editors felt least confident in dealing with data and/or image fabrication issues (24%), fraudulent submissions (23%), and intellectual property and copyright issues (21%).
  • Seminars and webinars

    Webinar 2019: Allegations of misconduct

    …look at the elements of "Due Process" (21mins into the recording). There were more questions than we had time to answer on the day but we asked the speakers to answer them after the webinar: your questions answered…
  • Case

    Institutions paying authors to be named on papers

    Some academic institutions are paying authors for the name of the institution to be included in the manuscript so that the institution has an increased number of publications in a given year. The institution gives the author payment and the author terms it as ‘funding’ or ‘grant’, which is not the case. The author publishes the research article in a journal with two affiliations and explains in…
  • Case

    Authorship of a commentary

    An associate editor invited a commentary to be written by one of the peer reviewers. When the commentary was submitted, the associate editor was a co-author. There could be the appearance of a conflict in the decision to accept the article on which the commentary was based if the associate editor is an author on the commentary. Question for the Forum
  • News

    Diversity in Peer Review: Survey Results

    …organisers/panels • Kinds of diversity that are important in peer review: Area of expertise (88%) Gender (77%) Race/ethnicity (74%) Age (66%) Other (21%), including location/nationality, organisation/institution type, career…
  • Case

    Paper submitted for publication without consent or knowledge of co-authors

    An article was submitted by corresponding author (CA) on 19 December 2011. After several revisions the article was accepted for publication on 23 March 2012. The article was published online 8 May 2012.At the time of submission, CA was a PhD student at a research centre (X).On 21 November 2012, co-author A (also head of the research group) contacted the publisher and…

Pages