Filter by content type

Filter by topic

Search results for '尼日利亚竞猜程序后台源码【TG���������@EK7676】平台包网搭建尼日利亚竞猜程序后台源码【TG���������@EK7676】平台包网搭建GIbCt3My9O'

Showing 41–60 of 106 results
  • Case

    Signing on behalf of other authors

    …appeared that some of the signatures had been written by the same hand. The editors challenged the senior author who investigated immediately upon his return and a fax was sent:           “…The last copy was signed in my absence and not all signatures were signed by the authors personally but by other colleagues with oral permission from the relevant authors ……Some of the signatures may still look…
  • Case

    Author trap/fabrication detection

    This is how I dealt with an author who submitted a fabricated manuscript to my journal. A junior doctor submitted a paper about the use of a drug in a particular condition. Three expert reviewers were sure that the author did not undertake the claimed study, emphasising that the drug was not available in our country (Middle Eastern country) and it had not been registered for clinical…
  • Case

    Dual publication

    The authors formally retracted the paper. Therefore, the paper was not re-instated. The reason given by the authors was that they did not want to go to the expense of providing an English translation of their original paper. At this stage my inclination is to do nothing further.…
  • Case

    Possible overlapping publications/data

    …actually true. As editor of journal A, I forwarded all the information to my publisher. I plan to contact the authors on review and after discussion with COPE. My publisher has also informed journals B and C of our plans to contact COPE before taking any initial action. As well as asking for guidance on how best to handle this case, we would like COPE’s opinion on which journal should be…
  • Case

    Concerns over research by an author in numerous, separate publications

    …respond to my message, which I am still waiting for. Three have expressed concern about the nature of the email; one of these editors has offered to judge the papers of the suspected author and provide a response, and I am waiting to hear back from them. One of the editors contacted a colleague who lives in the same country as the author and received a general response from their colleague who…
  • Case

    The single authored, unbelievable, randomised controlled trial

    …its unhappiness with the process. The university informed the editor that the lead author had resigned from his post. The author responded, explaining that it was “not practical” to respond to queries about the paper, because “all my papers are in storage and some pertaining to this study were mislaid. ” The university now wishes to “close the book on this matter” unless the editor could suggest…
  • Case

    Self-plagiarism?

    …right to publish the material. As editor, I was asked to take action but my only route was to contact the authors by e-mail. I received an email from the corresponding author assuring me that all procedures had been correctly followed and also an email from the first author, the MSc student on whose thesis the paper was based and now a PhD student with the corresponding author's university,…
  • News

    Guest article: Self-plagiarism in philosophy

    A quip heard in the hallways of some philosophy departments goes like this: when someone publishes a new book, a colleague says, “Congratulations! So, what are you calling it this time around?” With every witticism, there is some level of truth; my professional discipline of philosophy has been somewhat sluggish in addressing the problem of self-plagiarism. The term self-plagiarism is…
  • Case

    Unethical withdrawal after acceptance to maximize the 'impact factor'?

    …of the journal, as does all subsequent communications). On submission, the author checked a box where he agreed on a possible transfer of the paper within the publisher family. The author pleads that “The kinds of journals that my PhD student publishes in potentially affects his graduation prospects” and that publication in journal Y “could have terrible repercussions for a very promising…
  • Case

    Retraction update?

    I'm seeking advice on how my journal should publish an update to an author requested retraction. In a past issue, our editorial team accepted an author requested retraction; the authors cited errors in data reported in various figures. We have since learned of other errors in the paper and its figures, and we would like to now publish an update that provides more detailed and specific…
  • News

    Letter from the COPE Chair: October 2019

    …-publishers-perspective">publisher’s perspective on retraction by Catriona Fennell. I did a presentation on predatory publishing. I want to thank everyone for their feedback on my session and…
  • News

    Letter from the COPE Chair: June 2022

    Travel is once again becoming a part of my life. I recently returned from a wonderful trip to Cape Town, South Africa to participate in the 7th World Conference on Research Integrity (WCRI). The 30-hour trip from New York to South Africa was well worth it. I loved reconnecting with professional colleagues that I had not seen in years and making…
  • Case

    Self-plagiarism of review article

    …“as an author I have the factual and intellectual responsibility for the content of my papers, and if I want to express the same thoughts and say the same things, I am almost obliged to use the same words, unless I find better ones, and this is exactly what I have done in good faith without plagiarizing anyone… I have been invited for updated reviews, and therefore I have updated what needed to be…
  • Seminars and webinars

    Webinar 2021: Diversity, equity and inclusion

    …more. Tess: This is a tricky subject. In my circumstances, when I changed name, the first thing I did was to change my institutional email, which meant I couldn’t log in to ORCiD, until I confirmed my new identity with them. To achieve this I did have to reach out to ORCiD to verify myself, but it was possible, and they had a process for it.  External services already have…
  • News

    Guest article: Inclusion in Scholarly Practice

    …research. What materials constitute evidence in our fields, and why? And we can better interrogate how the premises of our findings may also reflect bias. Why have we framed issues and even fields the way we have? Looking at these factors also helps us to get to question of who is included. In my own discipline of history, for example, we have seen how expertise is often cast (sometimes literally cast,…
  • Case

    Has formal ethical approval been granted that satisfies publication criteria?

    …proviso they will not be identified individually. This study appears to do exactly that, except that this is not a retrospective audit, this is an interventional study whereby these players have been subjected to a specific regimen. In my opinion, there are several issues here. (A) A blanket proforma that these players were asked to sign does not constitute formal ethics approval for this…
  • Case

    A case of duplicate publication

    …contacted the President of their country’s specialty organization, who thinks that this is a new publication and the author has done nothing wrong.  Initially, my feeling was that if the original journal felt that this was an infringement on their copyright, then the paper should be withdrawn.  However, the comments from the President of their specialty association have left me and our editorial…
  • Case

    Breach of peer review confidentiality

    …what the editor was talking about. With that email reply, reviewer B included a different report with the words of explanation "THIS is my report on the manuscript". In good faith, and preserving anonymity, the editor forwarded that "second" report from reviewer B to the contact author whereupon the author replied that even that report referred to concepts that were no longer present, or no…
  • Case

    Unusually frequent submission of articles by a single author

    …letters. In the remaining one he is a co-author. The articles are on very diverse subjects. This set us thinking that, apart from his clinical work and studies, how he had time to conduct research, analyse the results and write the articles. The journal first wrote to Mr X for the necessary justification. He responded promptly, “I am one of the best researchers of my country and have…
  • Case

    Deception in submitting manuscript for publication

    A manuscript was submitted to my journal. The author, on his own accord, submitted the manuscript for review to several reviewers under the guise that this was sent by me. The author sent the following explanation: “In some of our previous encounters, you have indicated that finding sufficient cooperative reviewers has been a problem for you. In order to provide you with some help in…

Pages