Filter by content type

Filter by topic

Search results for '新棋牌模式『官网:ww80.cc』集杰棋牌丹东app,棋牌游戏牛牛加盟体育,棋牌游戏推广卡片体育app,小金棋牌真的假的电竞,天妃棋牌游戏下载国际,棋牌送金币可下分娱乐,棋牌游戏以小博大娱乐城,怎样捕鱼快体育官网,豪门传奇棋牌游戏辅助体育网址,棋牌勾机体育平台,金钻棋牌会所最新官网网址,温州567棋牌体育网页登录,篮球竞猜美职篮888官网-2022年6月26日4时35分47秒-wazwnaguy'

Showing 241–260 of 290 results
  • Submitting a guest editorial or opinion piece to COPE

    …any loss or damage caused or occasioned as a result of the publication of a guest editorial or opinion article. Publication history This policy will be reviewed and updated at the discretion of the editors. Published: 25 January 2022 Updated: 20 June 2023…
  • News

    Guest article: Detecting integrity issues

    …href="https://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts/systematic-manipulation-publication-process">Systematic manipulation of the publication process, COPE guidance 2022 The evolving relationship between universities and scholarly publishers, COPE Seminar Keynote address 2021…
  • Case

    Is there a time limit for submitting a critique of a published article?

    A letter to the editor was submitted to a journal with a comment referring to a study published a year previously. The reader raised concerns about the study and interpretation of the results. The editors of the journal examined the peer review comments of the manuscript and found that the aspects in question were missed out. The journal sought expert advice from an independent reviewer who com…
  • News

    In the news: April 2018 Digest

    …or all of these recommendations (http://www.nasonline.org/about-nas/Transparency_Author_Contributions.html)http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/02/26/1715374115 CODE OF ETHICS Code of…
  • News

    In the news: April 2020

    …direction varies.  https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/02/26/guest-post-an-open-agenda-european-funder-approaches-to-open-science/ UK universities and Wiley have struck a 4 year deal which will give UK-based corresponding authors the option to…
  • News

    In the news: January 2019 Digest

    …this could be rectified and argues the case for changing the cultural norms to allow this.https://psyarxiv.com/exmb2 COPE Council member Deborah Kahn Read 
  • Seminars and webinars

    Webinar 2021: Diversity, equity and inclusion

    …allowed multiple options to be chosen, and received a total of 306 votes across all options.  The most popular request is for Guidelines to be created (34% of votes), along with Flowcharts (26%) to aid decision making and increase confidence in processes to follow should any incidences of questionable material appear. Guidelines - 103 Flowchart - 80 Discussion Document…
  • News

    In the news: June 2020

    …Open Access cOAlition S recently announced price transparency requirements. Starting July 2022, only publishers who provide data in line with approved frameworks will be eligible to receive Open Access publication funds from cOAlition S members.
  • Potential paper mills

    …href="https://publicationethics.org/resources/research/paper-mills-research">Paper mills research report, COPE & STM, 2022 Systematic manipulation of the publishing process via “paper mills” COPE Forum discussion Systematic manipulation of the publication process,…
  • News

    In the news: January 2021

    …date, for all articles. The 2021 release will be the transition year with a full switch with the 2022 release. There will be no planned early access contribution to the 2020 JIF denominator and will likely result in inflated effect because it will include citations in 2020 based on earlier publication dates for those citations.  Peer review 322 editors of journals in ecology,…
  • Case

    Can a journal retract a paper against the recommendation of an institutional investigation?

    A research article, published several years ago, was alleged to have integrity issues relating to some of the figures. Following detailed checking of the figures, the editors confirmed these issues and found more issues. The authors provided the raw data, some of which also had integrity issues. An institutional investigation concluded that the data were sound but the editor still feels uneasy…
  • Case

    An ambiguous plagiarism case

    A paper was published in journal A. The plagiarism check tool did not show any similarity during the peer review process.   Some time after publication of the paper, the editor-in-chief was contacted by an author who had published a paper in journal B. They claimed that the paper published in journal A was plagiarised from their MSc research project thesis and asked journal A to ret…
  • Case

    Undeclared author conflict of interest

    A journal published a study related to a pilot programme run by an online mental health support resource which, at the time of publication, had a for-profit spinoff. At the time of the publication, this resource would share “anonymised” user data with the spinoff to create and market customer service software. Although this practice of sharing data has since been stopped, the authors of the man…
  • Case

    Request to remove author from submitted manuscript due to academic misconduct

    Regarding a submitted (but not yet accepted) paper from a scientific collaboration, one of the authors has asked whether an instance of academic misconduct or - for that matter - any non-scientific but rather unsavoury personal facts or accusations (e.g. a penal or civil proceedings) can be considered as a valid ground for requesting that the journal remove an author from the paper, as per the…
  • News

    In the news: November Digest

    …publishing choices. https://thinkchecksubmit.org/2019/10/17/think-check-submit-looks-forward-to-collaboration-on-new-research-programme/ Allegations of misconduct An investigation by King’s College London  has found 26 of…
  • Case

    Managing an editor’s undisclosed conflict of interest in a published article

    An opinion piece on a polarising political and technological topic was published. A discussion ensued on social media, and shortly after, the publisher received a formal complaint stating that the editor-in-chief of the journal, who had managed the peer review process for the manuscript, had a conflict of interest and should not have made the final acceptance decision. When the publishing team…
  • Case

    Article published at two journals after withdrawal from first journal

    Journal B was contacted by a group of authors who had published their article in Journal B a few months previously. The authors were concerned as they found that their article had been published by Journal A, a journal they had previously submitted the article to but withdrawn prior to publication. Journal B requested the withdrawal confirmation from the authors, and this was duly provided. On…
  • COPE team

    …employee of COPE. Alysa Levene Operations Manager Alysa joined COPE in 2022 and is responsible for the operational side of the organisation. Previously she worked as an academic historian and has published on the history of…
  • Common ethical and editorial dilemmas of author misconduct: how should we respond?

    …"Evidence of misconduct" "Probably no misconduct" Not applicable 1997 16 11 0 5 1998 33 30 2 1 1999 27 20 3 4 2000 32 26 6…
  • News

    In the news: August 2018 Digest

    …include that it is uneven across disciplines and stakeholders; that there is a lack of tools to make this seamless and that the benefits of FAIR will not be attained until it is practiced across the board.

Pages