- Event
Retractions and correction of the scholarly record: panel discussion
12:15-13:45 EST (UTC -5) Dan Kulp, COPE Chair, is joining the panel discussion on retractions and correction of the scholarly record. The panel will discuss ways to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the retraction process. Dan joins other panellists: Susan Garfinkel, Ohio State University; Dan Larhammar, Uppsala University; Ivan Oransky, Retraction… - News
Liz Wager discusses retractions in the BMJ
…margin-bottom: 15px; font-size: 1.3em; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 1.5em; word-wrap: break-word; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);"> … Outcomes of editors' attempts to investigate research misconduct
…Lasted >1 year Redundancy 33 7 3 4 48% Unethical research 16 5 4 7 25% Fraud 13 2 2 4 62% Med negligence 10 0 4 6 70% …- News
COPE grant on CrossCheck research update
The results of part of this research were presented at the CrossRef 2011 Annual Meeting, USA, 15 November 2011 (download the presentation, PDF 745kb). The purpose of this survey was to investigate journal editors’ use of CrossCheck to detect plagiarism, and their attitude to potential… - Event
Forum on Good Publication Practices, University of Macau
15:00 – 17:30 CST Trevor Lane, COPE Council Member, will speak at the Forum which pulls together consensual views on Good Publication Practices (GPP) for authors, reviewers, editors, and publishers of scientific journals. Topics to be covered at the Forum include: AI technologies for upholding the GPP Common dilemmas for journal editors Which… - News
First Brazilian Meeting on Research Integrity, Science and Publication Ethics (I BRISPE), December 2010
…will involve 4 full-day round tables and 3 workshops (Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo), which will be held on December 10, 13, 14, 15 and 16, 2010. Further details are available on the meeting website: http://www.ibrispe.coppe.ufrj.br/… - News
COPE Forum: 9 September 2015
The next COPE Forum meeting is on Wednesday 9 September, 3pm–4.30pm (British Summer Time) at The Montcalm London Marble Arch, 2, Wallenberg Place, London, W1H 7TN The agenda and materials are now available to download (PDF… - Case
The study that may or may not already have been published
A study purported to have been stimulated by a systematic review that had already been published in the journal. The new study included 15 patients who had been treated in one arm of a study and 15 who had been treated in another arm. The peer reviewers noticed that the original systematic review included 31 patients from the same authors. The editor contacted the authors asking them to make… - Event
6th World Conference on Research Integrity (WCRI), Hong Kong, 2019
…and Edanz Group, Fukuoka 15:45 – 17:15 Symposium (SY3) Preprints: Beneficial or harmful for research integrity and publication ethics? A debate (Grand Hall) Sabine Kleinert, The Lancet and Chris Graf, COPE Past co-Chair (Conveners) John Inglis, bioRxiv; and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York Heather Tierney, COPE Council; and American Chemical… - Event
APAME 2013 Tokyo
COPE will hold two 90 minute sessions on the afternoon of 3 August during the annual congress of the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Journal Editors (APAME) in association… - Webform
COPE authorship workshop 10 February 2021
…REGISTRATION FOR THIS WORKSHOP IS CLOSED Online cases workshop for COPE members Wednesday 10 February 2021 15:00-16.30pm (GMT); 10.00-11.30am (EST) The authorship workshop is free for COPE members but spaces are limited to the first 50 applicants. Only those registered will be… - Event
COPE Forum: Wednesday 22 June 2022
…Forum agenda On 22 June 2022 the COPE Forum will be held at 14:00-15:30pm (BST / UTC+1) 1. Update Update on COPE activities by the Chair. 2. Forum discussion topic We begin the COPE Forum with a discussion on the topic Dealing with… - Case
Suspected plagiarism
…have been? Should we have gone to the corresponding author’s institution? This was the reason given by the junior author, for interest: I am sorry for my <paper reference>. I might think those sentences is more suitable to express my viewpoint so that those sentences be used directly in his review. However this is bad habit for writing review among few students. I already… - Event
Reviewer Credits webinar: How can integrity in peer-review improve academic publishing?
How can integrity in peer-review improve academic publishing? Reviewer Credits are hosting a free webinar on 15 July 2020, 17:00-18:00 (CET). During this webinar, Prof. Ana Marušić will discuss the importance of integrity in peer-review and how this concept needs to be constantly stimulated. This interactive training session is focused on building responsibility and integrity using… - News
COPE Forum: 8 August 2018
Submit a case The next COPE Forum will be a face to face meeting at the INANE Conference in Boston on 8 August,1.30-4.30pm. All COPE members are welcome to join this Forum in person, whether or not you are attending INANE. It will follow the… - Translated resources
Cómo reconocer la potencial manipulación del proceso de revisión por pares
…involucrados en el proceso se conducen con integridad (Ref 1), el proceso de revisión por pares es susceptible de manipulación (Ref 2-4) tal como se comentó en el Seminario COPE 2016 en América del Norte For the latest version (English language) of this guidance visit https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.2.15 Related resources … - Event
ALPSP: How Publishing Ethics Can Nurture Trust in Scholarly Publications
…How Publishing Ethics Can Nurture Trust in Scholarly Publications The Association of Learned & Professional Society Professionals are delivering this course on Tuesday 8 March and Wednesday 9 March at 09:00-12:00 (EST), 14:00-17:00 (GMT), 15:00-18:00 (CET) Overview A wide range of ethical issues can arise in academic publishing. These can be caused…