You are here

Home Resources Flowcharts

Reviewer suspected to have appropriated an author’s ideas or data

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.2.5

COPE's guidance as a flowchart on what to do if you suspect a reviewer has appropriated an author’s ideas or data.

The instruction to reviewers should state that submitted material must be treated in confidence and may not be used in any way until it has been published 

Core practices:

About this resource

Author Developed for COPE by Liz Wager of Sideview © 2013 Committee on Publication Ethics First published 2006
Version 1 2006
How to cite this
COPE Council.What to do if you suspect a reviewer has appropriated an author’s idea or data. Version 2. 2013 https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.2.5

Our COPE materials are available to use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
Non-commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works —
You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. We ask that you give full accreditation to COPE with a link to our website: publicationethics.org

Full page history

  • 12 February 2021

    Changes to title as per the revision to the All Flowcharts PDF

  • 4 November 2020

    CP added

    View revision