In this webinar, the speakers discussed findings from a Sloan funded project, Reducing the inadvertent spread of retracted science. Panelists shared resources for educating authors, editors, and other stakeholders about the importance of retraction, ideas for emerging cross industry collaborations, and suggestions for implementation strategies in various institutional contexts and workflows.This is one of nine sessions as part of the COPE Seminar 2021.
Continued citation of retracted science and what we can do about it
Jodi Schneider is PI of Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: Shaping a Research and Implementation Agenda, and is assistant professor at the School of Information Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. She studies the science of science through the lens of arguments, evidence, and persuasion, with a special interest in controversies in science. She has held research positions across the US, Europe, and Chile. Her recent work has focused on topics such as systematic review automation, semantic publication, and the citation of retracted papers, with funding from NIH, IMLS, the Alfred P Sloan Foundation, and NSF.
Opportunities and perils of reforming retraction policies
Daniele Fanelli is Fellow in Quantitative Methodology at the London School of Economics, where he teaches courses in statistical methods and research integrity. He has conducted numerous influential studies on research misconduct, including analyses on retractions. He is also a member of the Committee for Ethics and Bioethics of Italy's CNR and of the Luxembourg Agency for Research Integrity, for which he advises and investigates allegations of research misconduct.
Is CrossMark star-crossed? What we've learned from trying to get publishers to do the same thing the same way
Geoffrey Bilder is Director of Technology and Research, Crossref. In 2012 Crossref launched an "update identification service" called "CrossMark". It was designed to allow publishers to easily disseminate correction/retraction information in a standard, machine-readable form and to encourage publishers to alert users to corrections/retractions using a standard, cross-publisher UI convention. What have we learned from CrossMark and how would we do things differently if we were starting again?
Moderator
Deborah Poff is a retired Professor of Philosophy and Senior Academic Administrator. She holds four degrees from three universities in Canada. Her PhD is in Philosophy of Science. During Deborah’s career, she was been the Director of a Research Institute, Dean of Arts and Science, Vice-President Academic and Provost, and President and Vice-Chancellor at various Canadian Universities. Deborah has also been an active researcher, teacher and editor, and is the founding editor in chief of the Journal of Academic Ethics which she edited for over 20 years. She is currently the editor of the Journal of Scholarly Publishing.
About this resource
Full page history
-
10 January 2022
Sabah
-
15 September 2021
Sabah
-
13 September 2021
Sabah
-
13 September 2021
Sabah
-
13 September 2021
Sabah
-
13 September 2021
Sabah
-
9 September 2021
Sabah
-
7 September 2021
Sabah
-
25 August 2021
Sabah
-
23 August 2021
copy edit