Focus on peer review
Peer reviewers should reveal conflicts of interests: a cautionary set of tales...
The author notes that COPE affirms the importance of peer reviewers to declare any potential conflicts of interest in the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers. That guidance has now been updated, as noted elsewhere in this Digest.
peer reviewers don't disclose COI
Difficulty of recruiting reviewers predicts review scores and editorial decisions at six journals of ecology and evolution
influence of reviewer recruitment
Alice Meadows previews some of the content to be discussed at the panel session on "What transparent peer review means"
transparent peer review
Welte and Grebe argue that “100,000 journals have to die” to fix scholarly publishing and that the classic peer review system is outdated at best
fix the academic peer review system
“The review process is so central to the validation of scholarship that it should not be conducted in the shadows”. An author and reviewer in conversation
a definition of open peer review
Authorship ethics
The still-too-common problem of gift authorship prompts author Trisha Greenhalgh to suggest an academic Hippocratic Oath
hippocratic oath for academics?
Graduate student publication ban proposal
Ethics examined and reasons explained. Seems like a bandaid to a much more important, likely self-inflicted, injury
should graduates publish?
When is behavioral research a clinical trial?
An open letter from over 2000 researchers to the head of the US NIH in which they argue that new regulations that classifying human behavior studies as clinical trials will create too much red tape.
unnecessary red tape
Preprint servers expanding
Six research communities opened preprint servers at the end of August 2017: Indonesia, library and information science, mind and contempletive practices, nutritional sciences, paleontology, and sport and exercise
new preprint servers
New models of academic publishing needed
“Placing scientific articles behind paywalls is absurd”. The author encourages academics to fix the problems
new frontiers
An author's prior misconduct: should you assume that past actions predict current performance?
Nature Plants treated a paper by a researcher who had multiple prior retractions just like any other paper
multiple retractions
Corporate funding of research
Corporations now fund a large percentage of biomedical research. What is the impact on journals? Guess where this author thinks we are. “Journals have become tools in corporate battles”
new phase of corporate research?