You are here

Guidance

Filter by topic

Filter by resource type

Search results for '%22wcri 2019%22'

Showing 1–20 of 148 results
  • Seminars and webinars

    WCRI 2019: Responsible authorship

    …investigations, and legal issues faced by an editor attempting to resolve a dispute prior to publishing a paper. Read more on this panel discussion…
  • Seminars and webinars

    WCRI 2019: Perspectives on predatory publishing

    …href="https://publicationethics.org/news/wcri-2019-predatory-publishing-plenary">Read more on this predatory publishing plenary…
  • Seminars and webinars

    European Seminar 2013: Posters

    …Poster: Experiences of unethical practices in a leading Pakistani biomedical journal [PDF 22KB]
  • Seminars and webinars

    WCRI 2019: Preprints and their place in the publication ethics landscape

    …on the ethics front, particularly in the health and medical fields where it is unclear whether open discussions on early research are beneficial toward improving the work, or whether there is potential harm in publishing unvetted and non-peer-reviewed findings. In this Monday afternoon session at WCRI, Chris Graf (
  • Seminars and webinars

    European Seminar 2019: Plenary on predatory publishing

    Perspectives on predatory publishing and thoughts about solutions with Deborah Poff, COPE Chair.…
  • Seminars and webinars

    European Seminar 2019: COPE retraction guidelines

    Session on retractions at the European Seminar 2019, with speaker Howard Browman who shares a review of the updated Retraction Guidelines from COPE. During the session we also heard from Thed Van Leeuwen and Catriona Fennell. Links to their presentations are below: Watch now
  • Seminars and webinars

    European Seminar 2019: Retractions, a publisher's perspective

    Catriona Fennell, Director of Publishing Services, Elsevier gives a publisher's perspective, and shares her own experience, at this session on retractions at the COPE European Seminar 2019. Thed Van Leeuwen speaks about the scientometrics of retractions, and Howard Browman shares the latest on COPE's revised retraction guidelines. Watch now
  • Seminars and webinars

    European Seminar 2019: Exploring Publication Ethics Issues in the Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences

    …review had been particularly critical.   5) Half of respondents have experienced self-plagiarism, with 22% saying this arose frequently. Again, this was especially widespread in Business, Finance and Economics (65% of editors working in these fields).   6) In the case of fraudulent submissions, these appeared to come up infrequently, though nearly 20% of…
  • Flowcharts

    How to recognise potential manipulation of the peer review process

    …authors on submission of their manuscript to a journal; another reviewer who is unable to peer review the manuscript. While there is an expectation that everyone involved in the process acts with integrity, the peer review process can be susceptible to manipulation as discussed at
  • Seminars and webinars

    North American Seminar 2019: Just ideas? The Status and Future of Publication Ethics in Philosophy

    At the 2019 COPE North American Seminar, Rebecca Kennison, from K|N Consultants, presented details of a project which  "seeks to foster greater awareness among humanities scholars and editors about ethical issues in philosophy publishing…. [It] acknowledges that research and publication ethics in the humanities are in many ways, and for good reasons, complex matters and that, unlike in…
  • Seminars and webinars

    European Seminar 2019: Analysis of retractions, initiators and reasons for retractions

    Session on retractions at the European Seminar 2019 chaired by Heather Tierney, COPE Council, with presenter Thed Van Leeuwen, who shares the results of a study of all retracted papers published in journals processed for the Web of Science (WoS). Thed Van Leeuwen describes the reasons for retractions, motivation for retraction and who retracts. Catriona Fennell gives the publisher's…
  • Seminars and webinars

    European Seminar 2019: Text Recycling Research Project

    Text recycling research project session at the COPE European Seminar in Leiden 2019. The session was chaired by Mirjam Curno, COPE Council, with invited presenters from the Text Recycling Research Project (TRRP). Watch now
  • Case

    Yet more attempted duplicate publication

    A study submitted to a journal was sent out for external review. The reviewer pointed out that it was essentially a shorter version of a paper already published elsewhere. The authors had referenced this paper, but did not make clear that the submitted paper was simply a summary of the other published paper. Nor did they mention the other paper in the covering letter, or include a copy of it. O…
  • Seminars and webinars

    North American Seminar 2019: In the aftermath of authorship violations in philosophy

    Michael Dougherty, Professor of Philosophy, Ohio Dominican University speaks about authorship violations in philosophy including: using pseudonyms in philosophy and how to avoid post-publication pseudonym surprises. why we should be concerned about plagiarism, types of plagiarism in philosophy and what are the options for whistleblowers? What editors and publisher…
  • Translated resources

    COPE同行评审专家道德指南

    …this guidance visit https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.9 Related resources Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers (English) Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers (Spanish)…
  • Seminars and webinars

    Webinar 2019: Allegations of misconduct

    In 2019 we hosted a webinar discussing allegations of misconduct, with a research institution perspective on research misconduct, and a discussion on the role of editors, journals and publishers in dealing with allegations of misconduct. Watch now
  • Seminars and webinars

    North American Seminar 2019: Ethical challenges in the arts, humanities, and social sciences

    At the North American seminar 2019, Kath Burton (Associate Editorial Director of Arts & Humanities, Routledge, Taylor & Francis) presented the initial research findings and the solution put together on the back of some research conducted by COPE, supported by Routledge. The aim of the research was to better understand the publication ethics needs of arts, humanities and social…
  • Research

    Exploring publication ethics in the arts, humanities, and social sciences: A COPE study 2019

    In early 2019 COPE, with the support of Routledge (part of the Taylor & Francis Group), commissioned primary research with Shift Learning to better understand the publication ethics landscape for editors working on journals within the arts, humanities, and social sciences. The research used a two-stage methodology: first exploring the issues qualitatively via two online focus groups with…
  • Seminars and webinars

    North American Seminar 2019: Women also know history

    Karin Wulf, Professor of History and well-known “Chef” in the Scholarly Kitchen introduced us to the terms “manels” and “whanels” (all male panels and all white panels) and provided some suggestions to help identify a more diverse group of experts from which to draw authors, reviewers, editorial board memb…
  • Flowcharts

    Arabic: all flowcharts

    …This is all of COPE's flowcharts in Arabic. For the latest version (English language) of this guidance visit https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.2.26. Other languages: Chinese | 

Pages