Showing 76–100 of 577 results.

All of the cases COPE has discussed since its inception in 1997 have been entered into a searchable database. This database now contains over 500 cases together with the advice given by COPE. For more recent cases, we also include follow-up information and outcome. We hope this database will provide a valuable resource for editors and those researching publication ethics.

You can search by classification or keyword using either the search field (top left) or by filtering your inquiry using the years and classifications/keywords listed below. A more detailed explanation of the classifications and keywords can be found on the;COPE Case Taxonomy page.

We encourage members to look at the database before submitting a case to the Forum to see if similar cases have already been discussed and to see the format used for presenting cases. However, please note that advice from the COPE Forum meetings is specific to the particular case under consideration and may not necessarily be applicable to similar cases either past or future.

All of the cases are brought by specific members to the Forum and are discussed between all the participants of the Forum. The notes below reflect the discussion that took place. The advice from the Forum participants is provided back to the member who brought the case to the Forum but the final decision on handling the case lies with the member editor and/or publisher. COPE accepts no liability for any loss or damage caused or occasioned as a result of advice given by them or by any COPE member. Advice given by COPE and its members is not given for the purposes of court proceedings within any jurisdiction and may not be cited or relied upon for this purpose.

  1. Two reviewer reports contain a significant amount of verbatim textual overlap

    Case number: 
  2. Ethical concerns about a study involving human subjects

  3. A case of plagiarism?

  4. Omitted author

  5. A case of salami slicing

  6. Authorship dispute

  7. Retraction update?

  8. Unusually frequent submission of articles by a single author

  9. New claim to authorship of published paper

  10. Ethical obligation to find reviewers

    Case number: 
    Case Closed
  11. Editor as author of a paper

  12. Findings of a published trial called into question by a subsequent audit of trial conduct

  13. Ethical concerns and the validity of documentation supplied by the authors

  14. Change in author’s name after publication

    Case number: 
    Case Closed
  15. Paper submitted for publication without consent or knowledge of co-authors

  16. Journal refuses to correct the record

  17. Inadequate assurance of human research ethics for a questionnaire

  18. Confidentiality breach by an associate editor

  19. Concerns about the reliability of findings following re-analysis of a dataset from a published article

  20. Retraction of the first article in the case of duplicate publication

  21. Fraudulent data presented in a manuscript

  22. Serial plagiarism by an experienced author

  23. Submitted paper already published elsewhere

  24. Reprimanded author plagiarizes again

  25. Plagiarism in a book title