Showing 1–25 of 582 results.

All of the cases COPE has discussed since its inception in 1997 have been entered into a searchable database. This database now contains over 500 cases together with the advice given by COPE. For more recent cases, we also include follow-up information and outcome. We hope this database will provide a valuable resource for editors and those researching publication ethics.

You can search by classification or keyword using either the search field (top left) or by filtering your inquiry using the years and classifications/keywords listed below. A more detailed explanation of the classifications and keywords can be found on the;COPE Case Taxonomy page.

We encourage members to look at the database before submitting a case to the Forum to see if similar cases have already been discussed and to see the format used for presenting cases. However, please note that advice from the COPE Forum meetings is specific to the particular case under consideration and may not necessarily be applicable to similar cases either past or future.

All of the cases are brought by specific members to the Forum and are discussed between all the participants of the Forum. The notes below reflect the discussion that took place. The advice from the Forum participants is provided back to the member who brought the case to the Forum but the final decision on handling the case lies with the member editor and/or publisher. COPE accepts no liability for any loss or damage caused or occasioned as a result of advice given by them or by any COPE member. Advice given by COPE and its members is not given for the purposes of court proceedings within any jurisdiction and may not be cited or relied upon for this purpose.

  1. A breach of confidentiality?

  2. A breach of intellectual property rights?

  3. A case of child abuse

  4. A case of duplicate publication

  5. A case of duplicate publication?

  6. A case of parallel publication?

  7. A case of plagiarism

  8. A case of plagiarism?

  9. A case of salami slicing

  10. A case of scientific misconduct?

  11. A case report of an experimental therapy, submitted by the patient

  12. A case with no independent institution to investigate

  13. A claim of stolen data and a demand for retractions

  14. A commentary on a piece of (unethical) research

  15. A falling out

  16. A first report, not followed by a second

  17. A further case of redundant publication

  18. A highly critical obituary

  19. A lost author and a new hypothesis

  20. A member of an author group listed on a paper denies authorship

  21. A paper describing a case of possible medical negligence

  22. A paper which discloses confidential material

  23. A patient was given an experimental course of complementary medicine when a standard treatment was available

  24. A problematic obituary

  25. A severe case of plagiarism?