Peer-review process

Showing 1–10 of 38 results.

  1. An article in a high profile journal that potentially misappropriates research published in lower impact journals

  2. Is it a breach of confidentiality to send letters to the editor to criticised authors for comment?

  3. Publisher and stakeholder with misaligned conflict of interest policies

  4. Submissions from members of the editorial board

  5. Author of rejected letter blames global bias against his message and undisclosed conflicts of interest

  6. WAME case

  7. Lack of trial registration leads to new concerns about study conduct and ethical review/approval

  8. An enquiry about arbitrating reviewers

    Case number: 
    11-12
    Year: 
    2011
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed
  9. Case of figure duplication and manipulation involving two journals

  10. Transparency of peer review to co-authors

    Case number: 
    11-22
    Year: 
    2011
    Resolution: 
    Case Closed

Pages