Filter by content type

Filter by topic

Search results for '通讯录交易程序源码【TG电报:@EK7676】平台包网搭建通讯录交易程序源码【TG电报:@EK7676】平台包网搭建6Nw67zkCgQ'

Showing 21–28 of 28 results
  • News

    Editor to Editor support for Journal Management

    …Practices...). This paper is published in Nurse Author & Editor and is freely available online. It generated 67 editorials (and counting) which are listed on the INANE website.   Supporting editorial best…
  • News

    Case Discussion: Editor and reviewers requiring authors to cite their own work

    …discussion document which will be ready, on our website, early this year. Nancy Chescheir on behalf of the COPE Education Subcommittee   Read January 2019 COPE Digest newsletter and use the COPE…
  • News

    Letter from COPE: June 2020

    …journal’s instructions for reviews. Among those who said that they edited reviewer comments, about 61% (67/109) said they either always or sometimes make a note of it in the manuscript manager system. Read the full report here. Comments from the
  • News

    In the news: May 2021

    …discussion can be found here. Peer review CUP has recently published an open access book “Reading Peer Review”, in which the authors analyse the database of peer review reports at PLOS One to gain…
  • News

    In the news: January 2019 Digest

    …this could be rectified and argues the case for changing the cultural norms to allow this.https://psyarxiv.com/exmb2 COPE Council member Deborah Kahn Read 
  • Case

    Request for a retraction of a retraction

    …remain on the drug being tested (perhaps treatment should be limited anyway, perhaps the drug is not licensed or available). The retracted paper showed few losses over 12–65 months of follow-up: 67 were in the experimental group, 65 completed; 68 were controls, 65 completed. Our journal recognises that nothing in this paragraph proves misconduct. We do not know why the author of the retracted…
  • Forum discussion topics

    Bias in peer review

    …in response to the kinds of diversity seen as being important in peer review. Two of the fifteen new reply options to this question in the 2021 survey also garnered significant responses, with 67% of respondents indicating that Career Level was important and 63% indicating that Geographic Diversity was important. The importance of Expertise Areas/Specialities decreased by 27% (from 88%…
  • News

    In the news: June 2018 Digest

    …target="_blank">https://www.universityaffairs.ca/opinion/the-black-hole/who-gets-to-see-papers-under-review/ Or before peer review?  In a study looking at whether researchers reveal their research prior to publication, Marie Thursby and colleagues survey academic researchers in 9 fields.  More than 67% disclosed their findings before publically presenting or publishing their work. Why? To…

Pages