Filter by content type

Filter by topic

Search results for '奖金池分红系统快速搭建【TG电报:@EK7676】平台包网搭建奖金池分红系统快速搭建【TG电报:@EK7676】平台包网搭建xKT34lH22S'

Showing 21–40 of 129 results
  • Case

    Yet more attempted duplicate publication

    A study submitted to a journal was sent out for external review. The reviewer pointed out that it was essentially a shorter version of a paper already published elsewhere. The authors had referenced this paper, but did not make clear that the submitted paper was simply a summary of the other published paper. Nor did they mention the other paper in the covering letter, or include a copy of it. O…
  • Flowcharts

    How to recognise potential manipulation of the peer review process

    …authors on submission of their manuscript to a journal; another reviewer who is unable to peer review the manuscript. While there is an expectation that everyone involved in the process acts with integrity, the peer review process can be susceptible to manipulation as discussed at
  • Case

    A breach of confidentiality?

    We ask our contributors to send us short mini-reviews of interesting articles they have come across in their regular reading. Most of our members also act as peer-reviewers and come across interesting articles as part of the peer-review process, before they are published . If they sent us one of those mini-reviews of an article they have peer-reviewed, and we kept the submission on file…
  • Event

    Annual Scientific Congress of Iranian Society of Medical Editors in association with COPE

    …International editors as well as Iranian and regional editors will be present. The seminar is free for COPE members but numbers are limited. For more information and to register, please visit the congress website: http://ismecope.sums.ac.ir Registration will close on 22 October 2011.…
  • Event

    ISMPP European Meeting 2019

    ISMPP is offering a 10% registration discount to COPE members for its 2019 European Meeting, Scientific Communications in a Fast-Paced World: Fighting Fit for the Future, 22-23 January, in London, UK. Learn more about the meeting at www.ismpp.org/european-meeting, and enter EU19COPE10 in the “Discount Code” field when you…
  • Case

    Author cannot be located

    A manuscript was submitted to a journal and after the review and revision process, it was accepted for publication. However, after the manuscript was accepted for publication, the coauthor stopped answering emails and therefore did not sign the copyright form, or affirm acceptance of the rights and responsibilities of authorship. The journal and production staff tried contacting the coauthor on…
  • Case

    Confidentiality and conflict of interest

    A paper reporting an attitudinal study was sent for peer review. The editor received a letter from the reviewer stating that as he was personally acknowledged in the paper, he felt there was a conflict of interest and so unable to review the paper. The reviewer also pointed out that the research in question was part of a larger commissioned project with strict conditions of confidentiality. Th…
  • Case

    WAME case

    …editors should perhaps ask the author to suggest 5 reviewers and reject the paper if he can’t. If a journal gives an average time to acceptance, then the author has a right to pursue the issue after this time. COPE’s advice would be if no progress is being made within 3-4 months, contact the author and keep them updated.…
  • Event

    COPE Forum: Tuesday 23 March 2021

    The 23 March 2021 COPE Forum will be held at 14:00-15:30pm (GMT). COPE Members can now register to attend the March Forum; the deadline to register is Monday 22 March. The discussion topic will be on the subject on publication ethics and books. This will be…
  • Case

    Redundant publication?

    …follow-up. The only new feature in the journal A paper is that all the women have a level of index greater than 1 standard deviation below the mean. The journal B study included those between -2.2 and +2.0 standard deviations. There was therefore some overlap of the inclusion criteria in the two trials. The journal A paper does not make explicitly clear whether the women described form part of a subgroup…
  • Event

    COPE Forum: Wednesday 9 June 2021

    The 9 June 2021 COPE Forum will be held at 14:00-15:30pm BST (UTC + 1). The discussion topic "When and how to involve multiple journals and…
  • Research

    No study’s perfect: a cross-disciplinary analysis of published errata 2011

    …existing studies on errata are small, limited in scope and rather different in methods and aims. We will conduct the first large quantitative analysis of errata published in all disciplines. These will be retrieved and sampled from the over 11,000 journals listed in the Essential Science Indicators database, which classifies journals in 22 broad disciplines. By combining quantitative and…
  • Case

    Wrong version of article published. Should we retract?

    The incorrect PDF version of an article was published together with the correct HTML, XML and EPUB versions. The variations between the PDF and other versions are language editing related, and do not affect the scientific value or scientific nature of the article.  Questions for COPE Council Given that two version of the article exists, should the journal retract th…
  • RePAIR consensus guidelines

    …Responsibilities of Publishers, Agencies, Institutions, and Researchers (RePAIR) in protecting the integrity of the research record The RePAIR Consensus Guidelines emerged from the collaborative effort of a working group from the conference entitled Keeping the Pool Clean: Prevention and Management of Misconduct Related Retractions, held 20-22 July 2016 in Fort Collins,…
  • News

    Website refresh

    …src="/files/u7140/Screen%20Shot%202019-03-08%20at%2010.28.01.png" style="width: 500px; height: 280px;" />   A case:   Guidance (the new starting point for finding any COPE resource):
  • Case

    A claim of stolen data and a demand for retractions

    The publishers received an email from author B about a recently published paper, which passed peer review and had been available online for about a month. In this email, author B claimed that he and another colleague C had determined the peptide sequence in question and had not published it yet, nor given permission for it to be published. He claimed that author A had access to his unpublished…
  • News

    Letter from the COPE Chair: September 2021

    …already have activities and events planned for the week, and you can follow all the activities on Twitter, #IdentityInPeerReview, or on the Peer Review Week website. To support Peer Review Week, COPE will be reproducing its 2018 survey on diversity and inclusion in peer review. This will give us a chance to see if attitudes, policies, or practices in…
  • News

    Survey reveals need for guidance on places to publish

    …the top choice for just over 20% of respondents. ● There is still work to be done in building awareness of how Think. Check. Submit. can help researchers address this challenge; 34% of respondents had not heard of the initiative before completing the survey. ● The responses to the survey revealed a sense of community ownership about the initiative, in particular the willingness of many…
  • Event

    COPE Forum: July 2023

    …issue 4. Updates to cases Authorship dispute involving a commercial institution Article published at two journals after withdrawal from first journal
  • Case

    Author’s name removed from submitted article

    …involvement as principal investigator, yet the submitted study made no mention of his involvement or his name. In addition, person X alleges that he contacted the funders before he left the Trust and they agreed that he should remain the principal investigator. To complicate matters a little, the Editor had been asked to serve on the steering committee for the study3-4 years previously, and did attend one…

Pages