COPE同行评审专家道德指南 COPE理事会 同行评审专家在确保学术记录的诚信方面发挥着作用。同行评审过程很大程度上取决于学术界 的信任以及积极参与，并需要参与各方都以负责任和讲道德的态度行事。同行评审专家在同行 评审过程中发挥着中心和关键的作用，但却可能在担当职责的同时并未获得任何指引，也没有意 识到他们的道德义务。期刊有义务为同行评审提供透明的政策，而审稿人有义务道德地、负责任 地进行评审。期刊与审稿人之间的清楚沟通对于促进一致、公平且及时的评审至关重要。COPE 听取了成员关于同行评审问题的情况意见并以COPE论坛参与人员的集体经验和智能作为指南 的部分基础。希望指南能够为研究人员提供有用的指导，成为编辑和出版商指导其审稿人的参 考，并作为机构培养学生和研究人员的教育资源。
For the latest version (English language) of this guidance visit https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.9
Related resources
Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers (English)
Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers (Spanish)
About this resource
Written by COPE Council
Version 2 November 2017
Version 1 February 2017
How to cite this
COPE Council. COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers (Chinese). Version 2. November 2017. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.11
Our COPE materials are available to use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
Non-commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works —
You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. We ask that you give full accreditation to COPE with a link to our website: publicationethics.org
Full page history
-
21 February 2023
Re-allocated to the new 'Translated Resources' category