1997
Select Cases tagged with '1997' and:
Keywords categories
authorship (1) consent for publication (2) data fabrication (2) lack of ethical review/approval (1) overlapping publications (2) participant confidentiality (1) participant consent (2) peer-review process (1) plagiarism (1) redundant publication (1) reviewer misconduct (1) undeclared CoI (reviewers) (1) unethical research (5) unethical treatments (1)
Should we have had author consent for a randomised controlled trial of a peer review?
Case Number: 97-02
Disagreement between a reviewer and an author
Case Number: 97-03
Living unrelated (commercial) organ transplant
Case Number: 97-04
The reviewer writes comments that he doesn’t want the author to see
Case Number: 97-08