lack of ethical review/approval
Carrying out experimental research that has not been approved by an appropriate ethical review body (such as a Research Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board) despite such approval being required
NB: Some types of data collection, such as routine audit, which may result in publication, do not require ethical review. Lack of review/approval does not necessarily indicate that the research was unethical but simply that the appropriate safeguards/approval processes have not been applied. See also guidelines of differences between research and audit
Select Cases tagged with 'lack of ethical review/approval' and:
Year categories
1997 (1) 1998 (7) 1999 (2) 2000 (3) 2001 (3) 2002 (5) 2003 (4) 2004 (8) 2005 (5) 2006 (6) 2007 (8) 2008 (1) 2009 (1)
A surgical series that is scientifically meaningless, has no ethics committee approval, and does not mention informed consent
Case Number: 00-01
The missing ethics committee and lack of written consent
Case Number: 00-14
Scientifically meaningless research without consent
Case Number: 00-23
No ethics committee approval or informed consent
Case Number: 01-05
Dubious surgery
Case Number: 01-20
Bizarre treatment of viral disease overseas
Case Number: 01-21
New surgical technique without evidence of either ethics committee approval or patient consent
Case Number: 02-01
An unethical ethics committee?
Case Number: 02-08
Contacting Research Ethics Committees with concerns over studies
Case Number: 02-11
Babies needlessly subjected to a painful procedure for research
Case Number: 02-12