Home » Annualreport » 2005

2005

Annual report
Download PDF (159 kb)

Cases: 
Misunderstood requirements for authorship
Consent and ethics approval questioned after acceptance
Ethical approval and fabrication of results
Using annual reviews to massage the impact factor
Massaging the impact factor
Competing interest
Russian scientific misconduct
Whose responsibility is duplicate submission?
Interactive case report of a patient with ongoing health problems
Redundant publication
Single patient trials and lack of data
Case report and consent
Palestinian refugee conditions
Interpretation of regulations: when is a waiver of authorisation acceptable?
Dispute over plagiarism
Plagiarism in a review article
Online trial of a new diagnostic tool
The case of a physician in private practice offering an experimental intervention
Anonymous information
Possible malpractice revealed in a case report
Lack of ethics committee approval?
Obtaining consent for a study of people with severe learning disabilities
Duplicate submission
Attempt at multiple plagiarism
Potentially unethical publication
Undeclared competing interests
Research on volunteers without informed consent or ethics committee approval
Retraction of false authorship
Dispute between authors and a reviewer
Multiple submissions of a paper
Undeclared conflict of interest
CV study: was ethics approval and consent required?
Attempts to draw attention to potential duplicate publication
Dual publication and attempted retraction by the author
Wholesale plagiarism
The disappearing authors
An accusation of fraud in a rejected paper
Duplicate publication in a foreign language
The disgraced author
Authorship dispute
Plagiarism and possible fraudulent publication
A highly critical obituary
Going public on potential fraud
Possible deception because of omission of important information
A problematic obituary
Undeclared conflict of interest
Plagiarism and possible fraud
An accusation of racism
Sloppiness or deception?
Attempted plagiarism of a published report
“Research” without ethics committee approval
Extensive plagiarism
Potential redundant publication
Potential duplicate publication
Is it duplicate publication when the first study is referenced in the second paper?
Unauthorised use of questionnaires
Attempted dual publication?
A patient was given an experimental course of complementary medicine when a standard treatment was available
An author thinks that a journal’s decision not to publish is ethically incorrect
Possible plagiarism and fabrication

Posted by admin on August 11th 2008